NJ considers PJM capacity market alternatives

The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities has opened an investigation into "how the State can best achieve its reliability, clean energy, and environmental objectives, while keeping costs to consumers as low as possible." Like many states, New Jersey’s utilities participate in a federally regulated regional transmission organization’s capacity market, but are also subject to state clean energy laws -- a tension that has caused the state's energy regulators to consider whether to leave the PJM regional capacity market.

At issue is whether New Jersey can "achieve its long-term clean energy and environmental objectives under the current resource adequacy procurement paradigm" -- the regional electric capacity market operated by PJM Interconnection -- or whether it should adopt an alternative mechanism to "meet New Jersey’s resource adequacy needs in a manner consistent with the State’s clean energy and environmental objectives, while considering costs to utility customers."

New Jersey electric utilities currently participate in the PJM regional markets, including a capacity market. The state has adopted a 2019 Energy Master Plan: Pathway to 2050, establishing a series of state-focused clean energy goals such as 7,500 MW of offshore wind by 2035 and 100% clean energy by 2050. Other states in the PJM region have adopted different clean energy goals.

At the same time, PJM's regional market is federally regulated. In December 2019, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission directed PJM to modify its "Minimum Offer Price Rule" or MOPR, governing the capacity market. Designed to counteract excessive market power, the federal ruling directed PJM to modify its MOPR to also counteract the pricing effects of state clean energy policies. In its state Energy Master Plan, New Jersey described FERC's action as "actively attempting to support fossil fuel interests in the [PJM] region under the guise of promoting ‘fair’ competition."

In response to the FERC's MOPR order, on March 27, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities issued an Order Initiating Proceeding in Docket No. EO20030203. Citing the federal order, the Board characterized it as "a direct attack on the State’s clean energy programs" and expressed concern that continued participation in the federally-regulated PJM market could frustrate New Jersey's ability to achieve its clean energy goals. The Board thus initiated a proceeding to consider whether to retain the current PJM market paradigm, or whether an alternative could achieve the state's climate and environmental goals at a lower cost to consumers.

Withdrawing from a regional transmission organization can be done under certain circumstances, but federally regulated tariffs and territories spanning multiple states with their own laws can complicate the path toward a clean break. As envisioned by the Board, possible alternatives for New Jersey might include using a "fixed resource requirement" or FRR approach under the PJM tariff to effectively withdraw one or more service areas from the broader PJM capacity market, or adopting a statewide clean energy standard that would require load-serving entities to source increased percentages of renewable or other clean energy.

Board staff subsequently issued a Request for Written Comments in the proceeding, soliciting written comments on four sets of topics by April 29. Issues raised in the request for comment include whether New Jersey could utilize the Fixed Resource Requirement alternative to satisfy its resource adequacy needs and accelerate its clean energy goals, whether modifications to the Board's Basic General Service construct could facilitate resource adequacy procurements aligned with the state's Energy Master Plan, and whether other mechanisms such as a clean energy standard or clean energy market could facilitate achievement of the state's clean energy goals.

Staff have suggested the Board's investigation will be completed later this year.

NJ approves offshore wind funding mechanism, rejects demonstration project

On December 18, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities took two actions affecting offshore wind: approving the state’s Offshore Wind Renewable Energy Certificate (OREC) funding mechanism, but rejecting a petition by Nautilus Offshore Wind, LLC to install a 25 MW offshore wind demonstration project in state waters off the coast of Atlantic City. Meanwhile, developers have formed a new joint venture to develop offshore wind in federal waters farther offshore New Jersey.

New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy has set a goal of 3.5 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity by 2030, and in May 2018 he signed into law a renewable energy bill codifying that goal into statute. On September 17, 2018, the NJBPU opened the nation’s largest single-state solicitation to date, seeking 1,100 megawatts of offshore wind. Applications will be accepted through December 28, 2018. Winning projects will be compensated through the OREC mechanism approved this week, which requires electric companies to buy defined quantities of ORECs from offshore wind developers, much like a traditional renewable portfolio standard mechanism.

Also on December 18, the BPU rejected a 25 megawatt demonstration project proposed by Nautilus (under development by EDF Renewables and Fishermen’s Energy). The Nautilus project would feature three turbines in state waters about 2.8 miles offshore Atlantic City. But the BPU found the Nautilus project did not demonstrate the economic and environmental benefits required under the Offshore Wind Economic Development Act for the state to commit ratepayer funds. In particular, the BPU found that Nautilus didn’t provide sufficient information to substantiate claimed economic benefits, and further that Nautilus demanded a price that was too high given the unsubstantiated benefits.

But offshore wind development may soon occur farther offshore New Jersey. On December 19, 2018, EDF Renewables North America and Shell New Energies US LLC announced the formation of a 50/50 joint venture, Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind, LLC to co-develop offshore wind generation in federal waters offshore New Jersey. The site is about 8 miles offshore Atlantic City. At issue is the 183,353-acrea OCS-0499 lease area, the rights to which were initially auctioned by the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management in 2015. That auction was won by Toto Holding Group subsidiary US Wind Inc., with a winning bid of $1,006,240.

More recent federal auctions for offshore wind site leasing rights have brought much higher winning bids -- for example, a December 2018 auction for sites offshore Massachusetts brought in about $135 million for each of three lease areas, totaling over $405 million in winning bids for about 390,000 acres.

US proposes offshore oil and gas leasing expansion

The Trump administration is taking steps that could ultimately lead to a significant expansion of U.S. outer continental shelf acreage available for oil and gas leasing.

Under federal law, the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is charged with administering site leasing for energy development on the outer continental shelf. The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act requires the Secretary of the Interior, through BOEM, to develop a five-year national plan for oil and gas sales in federal waters. The law requires the Secretary to balance criteria including environmental impacts, energy needs and resources, and adverse effects on the coastal zone.

On January 4, 2018, Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke announced a new Draft Proposed Program. He described its release as "an early step in a multi-year process to develop a final National OCS Program for 2019-2024," and as consistent with an April 2017 Executive Order implementing an "America-First Offshore Energy Strategy."

The Draft Proposed Program includes 47 potential lease sales -- the largest number of lease sales ever proposed for the National OCS Program’s 5-year lease schedule.  The plan includes 19 sales off Alaska, 7 in the Pacific Region, 12 in the Gulf of Mexico, and 9 in the Atlantic Region. Some of these areas have not seen leases sold in decades; for example, there have been no sales in the Atlantic since 1983 and there are no existing leases.

By contrast, the draft program includes 8 Atlantic lease sales between 2020 and 2024, covering federal waters offshore Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. The Pacific leases would similarly be the first sold in that region since 1984.

According to the press release announcing the draft's release, "Inclusion of an area in the DPP is not a final indication that it will be included in the approved Program or offered in a lease sale, because many decision points still remain. By proposing to open these areas for consideration, the Secretary ensures that he will receive public input and analysis on all of the available OCS to better inform future decisions on the National OCS Program."

Even if an area is offered in a lease sale, it may not draw commercial interest; even if leased, an area might not actually be used for exploration and production. But the draft plan significantly expands the acreage that would be available for leasing -- according to the Secretary, "the current program puts 94 percent of the OCS off limits," while the proposed program "proposes to make over 90 percent of the total OCS acreage and more than 98 percent of undiscovered, technically recoverable oil and gas resources in federal offshore areas available to consider for future exploration and development."

BOEM has solicited public comment on the draft plan, which will inform several further rounds of proposals and comment, before a Proposed Final Program (PFP) is considered. In the meantime, until a new program is finalized and adopted, the present 2017-2022 Five Year Program remains in effect.

New Jersey FERC license surrender and dam removal

U.S. energy regulators have accepted an application to surrender the licensee for a New Jersey hydropower project.  Earlier this month, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission accepted Great Bear Hydropower Inc.'s application to surrender its license for the Columbia Dam Project, located on the Paulins Kill.  While the Commission decision to accept license surrender does not necessarily mean the dam will be removed, it represents a significant step toward letting the dam owner pursue dam removal if it wishes.  The case also illustrates tensions between hydropower development and dam removal, which remain active in U.S. policy discussions, and the consequences of state jurisdiction following FERC license surrender.

On January 15, 1986, the Commission issued a 40-year license for the construction, operation, and maintenance of hydroelectric facilities at the existing Columbia Dam.  The project includes a 20-foot-high, 330-foot-long concrete dam, originally built by a utility in 1909.  The site was sold to the state in 1955, after which the original electric generation was discontinued.  Following the project's 1986 licensing by FERC, the licensee added a powerhouse containing two generating units with a total installed generating capacity of 530 kilowatts.

The dam remains owned by the state of New Jersey as part of the Columbia Wildlife Management Area, and the licensee has been operating the project under a long-term lease with the state. But significant efforts are under way to improve water quality in the Delaware River basin.  The Nature Conservancy has described a strategy for watershed restoration that features the Columbia Dam's removal as a key component.  After the state and The Nature Conservancy entered into an agreement to remove the dam, the licensee ultimately agreed to surrender its license and remove only its hydroelectric facilities originally added to the dam, leaving the state to perform any future dam removal.

Because the Columbia Dam Project is subject to Part 1 of the Federal Power Act, its license could not be surrendered without approval of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.  The licensee applied for surrender in October 2015.  The Commission granted that approval on August 10, 2016.

The FERC license surrender does not necessarily mean that the dam itself will be removed, although it does provide for decommissioning of the hydropower equipment.  The Commission accepted the licensee's proposal to remove the generating equipment, transformers from the powerhouse, and disconnect the electric connection to the local utility.  The license surrender will not be effective until the Commission agrees that the project’s facilities have been decommissioned in accordance with this surrender order.

As for the dam, the Commission noted, "It will be up to the state of New Jersey, the dam owner, to decide whether to remove the Columbia Dam, once the hydroelectric facilities have been decommissioned.  Dam removal would have some ecological, social, and economic benefits for the Paulins Kill watershed."  Following the effectiveness of license surrender, safety matters would primarily be state jurisdictional, and any dam removal would proceed primarily under state law.

While hydropower continues to play a significant role in the overall U.S. energy mix, with new and ongoing federal initiatives to increase hydropower generation, in some cases economics and environmental considerations may lead to the surrender of some project licenses.  This may be particularly true for some relatively small dams with fish passage issues facing relicensing in coming years.

US auctions NJ offshore wind sites

The U.S. Department of the Interior has auctioned the rights to lease nearly 344,000 acres offshore New Jersey for potential offshore wind energy development. 

Under federal law, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is responsible for leasing marine sites on the Outer Continental Shelf for energy development.  In addition to BOEM's oil and gas site leasing programs, the agency also operates renewable energy programs focused primarily on offshore wind and hydrokinetic resources (waves and currents).  Prior to yesterday's lease sale, BOEM had awarded nine commercial offshore wind leases offshore Massachusetts, Maryland, Rhode Island, and Virginia.

In September, BOEM announced that it would auction off the rights to two designated Wind Energy Areas offshore New Jersey.  That auction was held yesterday.  According to BOEM, the provisional winner of lease area OCS-A 0498 (160,480 acres) was RES America Developments Inc., with a bid of $880,715.  US Wind Inc. provisionally won site OCS-A 0499 (183,353 acres), with a bid of $1,006,240. Fishermen’s Energy LLC also reportedly participated in the lease sale but did not win either parcel.

Generally centered offshore of Atlantic City, the New Jersey Wind Energy Area starts about 7 nautical miles offshore and runs about 21 nautical miles seaward.  The U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory reports that full development of the area could support about 3,400 megawatts of wind generation.

Since the Obama administration's early "Smart from the Start" program, BOEM has engaged in efforts to spur offshore wind development.  President Obama's June 2013 Climate Change Action Plan features offshore wind as a tool to reduce the emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from domestic industry.

This emphasis on the linkage between offshore wind and action on climate change is increasingly clear in the administration's messaging.  Early press releases on BOEM's offshore wind programs emphasized "the Obama Administration's all-of-the-above energy strategy to continue to expand domestic energy production."  By July 31, 2013, in announcing the first ever competitive lease sale for renewable energy in federal waters, BOEM described "President Obama's comprehensive plan to move our economy toward domestic clean energy sources and cut carbon pollution."  Just two months later in September 2013, after the release of the Climate Action Plan, BOEM began using the phrase "President Obama's Climate Action Plan to create American jobs, develop domestic clean energy sources and cut carbon pollution."  BOEM continues to use this phrase in touting its offshore wind program's consistency with the Climate Action Plan, as recently as yesterday's press release about the New Jersey lease sale.

Perhaps more tellingly, the Department of Interior press release announcing yesterday's New Jersey sale references "COP21", the upcoming 2015 Paris Climate Conference, in its brief summary.  This reference to the Paris climate convention is not otherwise explained in the text of the press release.  Nevertheless its inclusion here highlights the interplay between domestic and international energy policy, as well as the potential role U.S. offshore wind might play in addressing climate change.

North Carolina offshore wind advances

Federal efforts to lease ocean sites off the North Carolina coast for offshore wind development advanced last week, when the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management issued a report finding that there would be no significant environmental or socioeconomic impacts from issuing wind energy leases in three specific areas.  The determination brings BOEM one step closer to auctioning off leasing rights off North Carolina for offshore wind development.

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is part of the U.S. Department of the Interior.  BOEM performs key duties under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, including resource evaluation, planning, and site leasing.  In furtherance of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan, BOEM has auctioned off the rights to lease sites in federal waters for offshore wind development off states including Massachusetts, Maryland, Virginia, and Rhode Island.  Altogether, BOEM has awarded nine commercial wind leases.  Seven of these were awarded through its competitive lease sale process, generating over $14.5 million in high bids for over 700,000 acres in federal waters. 

Federal law prescribes the process BOEM must undertake to lease sites for offshore wind development.  Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), BOEM must evaluate the environmental and socioeconomic impacts of proposed actions.

For the proposed leasing off North Carolina, in January 2015 BOEM published its Environmental Assessment (EA) of the impacts of granting commercial wind leases and allowing of site characterization and assessment activities on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf.  On September 17, BOEM issued a revised Environmental Assessment.  That EA found there would be no significant environmental or socioeconomic impacts from issuing wind energy leases and allowing site characterization activities.  This "Finding of No Significant Impact", or FONSI, enables BOEM to proceed to the next step in the leasing process.

That next step will occur in October, when BOEM will convene a public meeting of the North Carolina Renewable Energy Task Force.  After considering the input from the Task Force, BOEM will publish a “Proposed Sale Notice” in the Federal Register, which will include a 60-day public comment period. That notice would be followed by a lease auction, likely similar to those held for sites off other states.

In addition to its proposed North Carolina activity, BOEM expects to hold a competitive lease sale for sites offshore New Jersey later this year.

Maine RGGI report 2015: price impact "relatively modest", programs helpful

For 8 years, states in the Northeastern U.S. have participated in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.  RGGI, the first market-based greenhouse gas regulatory program in the United States, represents a cooperative effort by participating states to cap and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the electric power sector, coupled with a market for auctioning and trading emission allowances.  While some groups feared that the RGGI program would increase electricity prices, a recent report by the Maine Public Utilities Commission found that the impact of RGGI on electricity prices in Maine has been relatively modest -- while finding that RGGI-funded programs contribute to economic development and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

RGGI formed in 2007, when ten states -- Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont -- agreed to first cap, and then slowly reduce, the greenhouse gas emissions of their electrical energy sectors by 10% by 2018.  While New Jersey withdrew in 2012, the program has remained strong; in 2014, the remaining states subsequently tightened the RGGI cap for 2014 from 165 million short tons of carbon to 91 million short tons, then further declining 2.5% per year from 2015 to 2020.

While each participating state adopted its own laws implementing RGGI, in general the RGGI laws require certain generators of electricity to track their carbon emissions and acquire an “allowance” for every ton of carbon dioxide or its equivalent that they emit.  States conduct periodic auctions of allowances, and market participants are free to engage in secondary market trades.  Generators must purchase or trade for enough emissions allowances to match the number of tons of CO2-equivalent emitted.  The cost of acquiring these allowances gives generators an incentive to improve their efficiency or switch to fuels with a lower carbon intensity.

Each state also adopted its own laws governing the use of funds raised by state auctions of RGGI allowances.  In Maine, most funds go to the Efficiency Maine Trust for purposes including measures, investments and arrangements that reduce electricity consumption or reduce greenhouse gas emissions and lower energy costs at commercial or industrial facilities, and for investment in measures that lower residential heating energy demand and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

RGGI has conducted 27 quarterly allowance auctions since September 2008, through which Maine has received a cumulative total of $ 62.22 million in RGGI auction proceeds.  Maine’s auction proceeds in 2014 totaled $11.37 million. According to the Maine Public Utilities Commission's report:

the annual cost to Maine ratepayers of the RGGI program was approximately $0.0024 per kWh. For the average Maine residential customer using 530 kWh per month, the 2014 RGGI program cost was approximately $ 1.27 per month. For a commercial customer using 25,000 kWh per month the 2014 RGGI program cost was approximately $60.00 per month. A large commercial or industrial customer using 500,000 kWh per month would have had a 2014 RGGI program cost of approximately $1,200 per month.

On the benefits side of the ledger, the Commission's report cites a finding that "all RGGI proceeds since 2008 are expected to return more than $2 billion in lifetime energy bill savings to more than 3 million households and more than 12,000 businesses across the eight states taking part in RGGI."  The Commission also cited its July 2014 report to the Legislature quantifying the increases in employment, real personal income, and gross state product expected to occur in Maine as a result of the cap tightening and other changes implemented in 2014.  That report found:

economic impacts for the New England region include a cumulative increase in Gross Regional Product of over $2 billion, a cumulative increase in employment of 38,900 job-years, and a cumulative increase in real personal income of $1.5 billion including a cumulative increase in Maine Gross State Product of $200 million, a cumulative increase in employment of more than 5,000 job-years, and a cumulative increase in real personal income of $100 million.

Based on these observations, the Maine Public Utilities Commission's 2015 report on RGGI concludes that "the impact of RGGI on electricity prices has been relatively modest, while RGGI-funded programs contribute to the gross state product, job growth, and personal income, and also reduce greenhouse gas emissions."

Federal offshore wind auction held for sites off Massachusetts

Federal ocean energy managers have concluded an auction to lease over 350,000 acres off the Massachusetts coast to prepare for offshore wind development.  Of the four parcels up for bid in today's auction, one was provisionally awarded to RES America Developments, Inc. and another to Offshore MW LLC.  Two other parcels failed to attract any bids.

Onshore wind turbines near the Massachusetts coast.

In today's auction conducted by the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), RES America Developments, Inc. provisionally won the rights to Lease OCS-A 0500 (187,523 acres) after two rounds of bidding, with a winning bid of $281,285.  Offshore MW LLC provisionally won the rights to Lease OCS-A 0501 (166,886 acres) after two rounds of bidding, with a winning bid of $166,886.  These winning bids are significantly below those that were required to win previous federal competitive lease sales for offshore wind sites.

While today's lease awards are a step forward for U.S. offshore wind, neither lease awarded today grants the right to construct or operate an offshore wind project.  Rather, these leases have a preliminary term of one year, to allow the lessee time to prepare a Site Assessment Plan describing the installation of meteorological towers and buoys and other activities the lessee plans to perform to assess local wind resources and ocean conditions.  Site Assessment Plans must be submitted to BOEM for review and approval.

Once BOEM approves a Site Assessment Plan, the lessee will then have up to five years in which to prepare and submit to BOEM a Construction and Operations Plan (COP) providing detailed information for the construction and operation of a wind energy project on the lease.  After BOEM receives a Construction and Operations Plan from a lessee, BOEM will conduct an environmental review of and public comment period for the proposed project.  If BOEM approves a Construction and Operations Plan, the lessee will have an operations term of 25 years.

Lease OCS-A 0502 (248,015 acres) and Lease OCS-A 0503 (140,554 acres) did not receive bids in today's auction.  As shown on a BOEM nautical chart of the Massachusetts Wind Energy Area, these lease areas are generally farther from the Massachusetts coast than the areas awarded through today's auction.

BOEM touts its offshore wind leasing program as part of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan.  The auction held today by BOEM represents the nation’s fourth competitive lease sale for renewable energy sites in federal waters.  Including this auction, competitive lease sales have generated more than $14.5 million in high bids for more than 700,000 acres in federal waters.  Previous auctions covered sites off Rhode Island and Massachusetts, Virginia, and Maryland.  BOEM expects to hold another competitive lease sale offshore the New Jersey coast in 2015.  

FERC issues EIS for Algonquin Incremental Market gas project

Staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission have issued a final Environmental Impact Statement for a proposed natural gas transmission project connecting New York and New England.  In that report, Commission staff found that Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC's Algonquin Incremental Market Project would result in some adverse environmental impacts, but that most of these impacts could be mitigated and reduced to less-than-significant levels.

A marker for the Williams Northwest Pipeline in Arches National Park, Utah.

 Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC -- a subsidiary of Spectra Energy Partners, LP -- already owns a natural gas pipeline and transmission network running from the Texas Eastern Transmission system in New Jersey to the Maritimes & Northeast system near Boston.

In 2014, Algonquin proposed the Algonquin Incremental Market project.  The AIM project's would provide firm transportation service of 342,000 dekatherms per day of natural gas to local distribution companies and municipal utilities in Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts.  Algonquin’s stated objectives for the Project are:

• to provide the pipeline capacity necessary to transport additional natural gas supplies to meet the immediate and future load growth demands of local gas utilities in southern New England;
• eliminate capacity constraints on existing pipeline systems in New York State and southern New England;
• provide access to growing natural gas supply areas in the Northeast region to increase competition and reduce volatility in natural gas pricing in southern New England;
• improve existing compressor station emissions through the replacement of existing compressor units with new, efficient units; and
• provide the additional service by November 2016.

As envisioned by Algonquin, the project will include the construction and operation of about 37.4 miles of natural gas pipeline in New York, Connecticut, and Massachusetts.  The project entails replacing some segments of existing pipeline, extending an existing loop pipeline to increase the system's capacity to ship gas, and installing some new pipeline.  It also includes modifications to six existing compressor stations, modifying existing meter and regulating stations, and the construction of 3 new meter and regulation stations.

Under federal law, Algonquin needs authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct and operate the AIM project.  Algonquin filed its application to the FERC on February 28, 2014.  As part of the FERC's review process, the National Environmental Policy Act requires the agency to analyze and document the environmental effects of proposed federal actions such as granting Algonquin's application.

In Algonquin's case, that documentation took the form of a Final Environmental Impact Statement issued by the FERC staff today. In the final EIS, FERC's environmental analysts conclude that construction and operation of the AIM project would result in some adverse environmental impacts. However, FERC staff found that most of these impacts would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with the implementation of mitigation measures and plans proposed by Algonquin, along with additional measures recommended by the FERC staff.  Staff pointed to factors including the degree to which proposed AIM project pipeline facilities would be within or adjacent to existing rights-of-way, the planned use of the horizontal directional drill method to cross the Hudson and Still Rivers, which would avoid any direct impacts on these resources, as well as plans to minimize impacts on natural and cultural resources during construction and operation of the Project.

With the final Environmental Impact Statement issued, the FERC Commissioners will consider its staff's recommendations in making a final a decision on the AIM project.  Multiple studies have highlighted the need for up to 2 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of new pipeline capacity into New England and neighboring markets to improve reliability and reduce the cost to consumers of electricity and natural gas.  At a planned size of 342,000 dekatherms (or 0.342 Bcf) per day, the AIM project is relatively small in capacity compared to other proposed projects such as Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.P.'s proposed Northeast Energy Direct Project, which is designed to be scalable up to 1.2 to 2.2 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas capacity.  Which pipelines end up being approved and built will shape the New England energy landscape in the coming years.

Feds to auction North Carolina offshore wind sites

The U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has announced plans to auction the rights to lease sites off the North Carolina coast for offshore wind projects.

Under the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's "Smart from the Start" competitive program for leasing sites on the outer continental shelf (OCS) for commercial wind energy development, BOEM conducts a series of stakeholder and environmental review processes.  Through these processes, BOEM identifies areas that are attractive for commercial offshore wind development, while also protecting important viewsheds, sensitive habitats and resources and minimizing space use conflicts with activities such as military operations, shipping and fishing.

For North Carolina, the process began in December 2012 when BOEM published in the Federal Register a Call for Information and Nominations and a Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Assessment.  After considering the public comments and responses, BOEM defined three Wind Energy Areas off North Carolina:

• The Kitty Hawk Wind Energy Area begins about 24 nautical miles (nm) from shore and extends approximately 25.7 nm in a general southeast direction at its widest point. Its seaward extent ranges from 13.5 nm in the north to .6 nm in the south. It contains approximately 21.5 OCS blocks (122,405 acres).
• The Wilmington West Wind Energy Area begins about 10 nm from shore and extends approximately 12.3 nm in an east - west direction at its widest point. It contains just over 9 OCS blocks (approximately 51,595 acres).
• The Wilmington East Wind Energy Area begins about 15 nm from Bald Head Island at its closest point and extends approximately 18 nm in the southeast direction at its widest point. It contains approximately 25 OCS blocks (133,590 acres). 

Map of North Carolina Wind Energy Areas, courtesy of BOEM.

The North Carolina auction will follow a series of similar auctions for East Coast offshore wind sites in federal waters over the past year, including sites off Massachusetts and Rhode Island and Virginia, and will come after the scheduled August 19 auction for sites off Maryland.  To date, BOEM has awarded five commercial wind energy leases off the Atlantic coast: two non-competitive leases (for the proposed Cape Wind project in Nantucket Sound and an area off Delaware) and three competitive leases (two offshore Massachusetts-Rhode Island and another offshore Virginia).  Altogether, the competitive lease sales have generated more than $5 million in high bids for more than 277,500 acres in federal waters.  BOEM expects to hold additional competitive auctions for wind energy areas offshore Massachusetts and New Jersey in the coming year.

When will North Carolina offshore wind sites be auctioned?  Who will bid?  Who will win -- and what will the high bid be?  Perhaps most fundamentally, will the BOEM leasing process lead to anyone developing a offshore wind project off North Carolina?

NJ regulators reject offshore wind project

The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities has voted against extending ratepayer subsidies to an offshore wind project proposed by developer Fishermen's Energy, challenging the project's financial viability.

The New Jersey coast near Atlantic City, seen from above.

Back in 2011, Fishermen's Energy proposed a 25-megawatt offshore wind pilot project to be located off Atlantic City.  The developer applied to the Board of Public Utilities for ratepayer support under New Jersey's Offshore Wind Economic Development Act of 2010.  That law directed the Board of Public Utilities to develop a program to require utilities to source a percentage of the electricity they sell in New Jersey from one or more qualified offshore wind projects.  To track energy from offshore wind, the law envisioned the creation of offshore renewable energy certificates, or ORECs, that could be sold by qualified offshore wind projects to the load-serving utilities.  The concept was that given the relatively high costs and uncertainty of offshore wind, no project could be financed or built without a steady revenue stream from OREC sales.

But the New Jersey project appeared to stall before the Board.  Charged with creating the OREC program and evaluating whether the Fishermen's Energy project could qualify to produce ORECs, the Board was faced with serious technical tasks.  As the regulatory process for the Fishermen's Energy project lengthened -- ultimately stretching to over 1,000 days -- Board staff raised concerns over the financial viability of the project, as well as over the impact of the requested subsidy to ratepayer costs.  Despite trimming the project's estimated costs to $188 million, these concerns remained, leading Board staff to recommend denial of Fishermen's Energy's request for OREC certification.
  
Yesterday, the Board of Public Utilities rejected Fishermen’s Energy’s proposal by a unanimous 4-0 decision.  While the Board's formal written order has not yet been released, expect it to explain the Board's reasoning in more detail when it surfaces next week.  In the meantime, Fishermen’s Energy is undoubtedly considering its options, which may include dropping the project, appealing the Board's rejection, or finding alternative ways to de-risk and finance the project.

NJ board to decide on offshore wind project

Will New Jersey regulators approve key support for an offshore wind project proposed off the Jersey shore?

Many coastal states and nations are placing new focus on energy projects designed to generate electricity from offshore winds.  A project off New Jersey, first proposed in 2011, appeared to make some initial progress, but has since seemed to stall -- due in part to regulatory delays at the state level.  With a decision by the state Board of Public Utilities (BPU) expected this week, will the Fishermen's Energy offshore wind project move forward?

Fishing boats in a small harbor along Maine's midcoast.

The New Jersey coast offers a fairly unique combination of wind resources and proximity to customer demand.  To capitalize on this combination, the New Jersey legislature and government adopted measures promoting the development of the state's offshore wind resource.  For example, New Jersey's Energy Master Plan calls for an ambitious target of 1,100 megawatts of offshore wind installed by 2020.

In response to the opportunity, in May 2011,  Fisherman's Energy submitted an application to the BPU under the Offshore Wind Economic Development Act for an offshore wind demonstration project.  The Cape May, New Jersey-based developer proposed five, five-megawatt wind turbines in state waters about 2.8 miles off the Atlantic City coast, with a total capacity of 25 megawatts and an estimated cost of $200 million to $300 million.  By the end of 2012, the project had won substantially all of the permits necessary for its development and operation, including approvals by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Army Corps of Engineers -- but a key piece of the regulatory and financing puzzles remains missing.

Under New Jersey law, the BPU may select one or more qualified offshore wind  projects for financial support in the form of a long-term contract to buy Offshore Wind Renewable Energy Certificates, or ORECs, from the developer.  This revenue stream is viewed as essential to enable a developer to finance and construct a project.

But nearly 3 years later, the state OREC review process remains ongoing. Last year, BPU Staff recommended the BPU reject Fishermen’s project on the grounds that it demonstrated no economic benefits but bore unnecessary technology risk due to its selection of XEMC turbines.  But project advocates, including the New Jersey Rate Counsel, support the project for its apparent consumer benefits.  Nevertheless, the BPU has yet to approve an OREC program.

Meanwhile, crucial federal tax incentives such as the renewable energy business investment tax credit have ended.  Many renewable project developers have found these credits essential in building financing packages for their projects over the last years; while the credits may be reenacted in some form, their loss may mean Fishermen's Energy needs to revise its financial projections.

Fishermen's Energy -- and the many other stakeholders following the project -- may soon learn the project's fate.  The New Jersey BPU is scheduled to vote today on whether to approve the project and authorize it to produce and sell ORECs.  Will the BPU grant Fishermen's Energy's request?

Electricity and Super Bowl XLVIII: Will the lights stay on?

Fans will soon pack MetLife Stadium for Super Bowl XLVII.  The National Football League's 2013-2014 season championship game will be held on February 2 at 6:30 PM (Eastern). Following the power outage during last year's Super Bowl, organizers of this year's event are taking extra precautions to avoid disruptions to the East Rutherford, New Jersey stadium's electricity supply.  At the same time, organizers are promoting the environmental aspects of the power supply for this year's game.

During Super Bowl XLVII at the Mercedes-Benz Superdome in New Orleans, Louisiana, a power outage moments after the beginning of the second half of play caused many of the stadium lights and systems to go dark.  Between restoring power supply, rebooting computer systems, and letting stadium lighting cool and return to full power, it took 34 minutes for play to resume.  Subsequent investigation revealed that the outage occurred when load-monitoring equipment had opened a breaker after detecting an abnormality in the system.

Organizers hope this year's championship is free from such disruption.  MetLife Stadium and the rest of the Meadowlands Sports Complex is served by utility Public Service Electric & Gas Co. or PSE&G.  Two power lines feed into the substation serving the complex, and on-site generators add additional capacity.  PSE&G has been reported as expecting the game to draw as much as 20 megawatts of power, and the utility, NFL, and stadium owner have collaborated on measures and testing to ensure continuity of service during the big game.

Meanwhile, PSE&G's parent PSEG has partnered with the NFL Environmental Program to source renewable energy for the game.  PSEG has agreed to purchase and retire a renewable energy credit, or REC, for every megawatt-hour of electricity used at the stadium, the AFC and NFC team hotels, and Super Bowl in Times Square.  240 solar RECs are slated to come from PSE&G's nearby 3-megawatt Kearny solar farm, as well as 5,700 additional RECs from the 7.5-megawatt Jersey Atlantic Wind Farm near Atlantic City.

Beyond electricity, event organizers have committed that all the waste oil generated from food production during the game will be processed into biodiesel fuel by Tri-State Biodiesel, and that all other food waste will be composted.

Presumably, most fans' attention will be focused on the game.  Will the organizers' measures prevent power outages in an environmentally friendly manner?

NJ offshore wind project faces dilemma

Fishermen's Energy's proposed offshore wind project off the New Jersey coast has essentially all its permits in place to start construction -- but the project's future is in doubt over a question of financial support from electricity ratepayers.

Fishermen's Energy has proposed building a 25-megawatt wind project about 2.8 miles off the coast of Atlantic City.  The $200 million project would be connected to the mainland electricity grid, enabling the power it produces to be sold to New Jersey electric customers.  The project has already received key permits, such as approval by the Army Corps of Engineers to begin construction.

Building what could be the nation's first commercial offshore wind project will be expensive.  While future offshore wind projects could be cost-competitive against more traditional electric generation resources, the New Jersey pilot project's finances rely on a portfolio of federal and state financial incentives.  These include federal tax credits, a grant from the U.S. Department of Energy, and a state commitment that utility ratepayers will shoulder above-market costs.

A 2010 New Jersey law established an offshore wind renewable energy certificate program known as OREC that was designed to provide that ratepayer commitment.  For over a year, Fishermen's Energy has been waiting for the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities to decide whether to require mainland utilities to purchase the project’s renewable energy output.  But that case remains pending, with no clear state-law timeline for its resolution.  Issues in play include the project's cost to ratepayers, particularly if the project fails to win further competitive grants from the federal Department of Energy.

In the meantime, Fishermen’s Energy needs to spend at least $10 million on the project this year to remain eligible for the federal investment tax credit.  Yet the developer is presumably reluctant to commit those funds before learning whether it will also win ratepayer support.  As December 31 draws nearer, this dilemma makes it more challenging for Fishermen's Energy to sustain project development efforts.

Hurricane Sandy prompts Jones Act waiver

Hurricane Sandy's disruption of petroleum shipments and refining has led Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano to issue a temporary waiver allowing foreign oil tankers to enter ports in the northeastern United States.

The Jones Act, a federal law enacted as part of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, limits who may carry on coastal shipping between domestic ports.  This so-called cabotage law generally requires that all goods transported by water between U.S. ports be carried in U.S.-flag ships, constructed in the United States, owned by U.S. citizens, and crewed by U.S. citizens and U.S. permanent residents.

Hurricane Sandy's impacts to northeastern energy infrastructure included disruption of oil and gasoline supplies in the area near New York City and New Jersey.  Between reduced supply and concentrated demand, gasoline is reported to be in shortage conditions.  Long lines are reported at gas stations, and demand at some stations has led them to run out of gasoline. 

In an attempt to alleviate the shortage, today Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano issued a temporary, blanket waiver of the Jones Act.  The waiver is designed to allow foreign-flagged oil tankers, that would otherwise be barred from the U.S. coastwise trade, to ship petroleum products from the Gulf of Mexico to Northeastern ports.  The waiver will remain operative through November 13th.

Assessing Hurricane Sandy's energy impacts

Yesterday Hurricane Sandy made landfall in New Jersey, but the magnitude of the storm meant that heavy winds, strong rains, and a powerful coastal storm surge affected a broad swath of the mid-Atlantic and northeastern parts of the United States.

One consequence of the storm is widespread power outages.  As of 8:00 AM yesterday, about 36,000 electricity customers had lost power in Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, and Virginia.  By 2:00 PM yesterday, outages were up to over 316,000, in the states listed above as well as in Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania.  At that time, New York had the most outages (105,089 customers, or about 1%), but New Hampshire was the hardest hit in terms of percentage affected (18,190 customers, or about 3%).  These reported outages came six hours before the storm officially made landfall, making outage numbers much higher today -- some reports indicating 8 million customers without power.

[Update: as of 9:00 AM this morning, the Department of Energy reports 8.1 million customers without electricity, including 62% of New Jersey, 31% of Connecticut, and 23% of Rhode Island.]

In addition to these power outages, some electricity generating facilities have shut down.  The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reports three nuclear power units in the Northeastern United States had to shut down and two units reduced as a result of impacts from Hurricane Sandy.  Reasons range from water pump failure to encroaching high water to problems on the external power grid.

Another consequence of the storm is disruption to oil refineries.  By 1:00 PM yesterday, two mid-Atlantic refineries had closed, with four more shutting down part of their production.  In total, 1.1 million barrels per day of refining capacity had been disrupted due to the storm.

Today, as the storm has moved inland, crews are working hard to recover from the storm.  It is still early to assess the total damage from the storm, as well as whether its disruption to energy infrastructure will be temporary or longer-lasting.

Hurricane Sandy's effects on energy

Hurricane Sandy is expected to make landfall near the southern coast of New Jersey this evening.  The storm has already dealt damage to Cuba, Jamaica, and Haiti, and is expected to carry significant storm energy northward into the mid-Atlantic and northeastern United States.  Power outages are already being reported, but many more are expected: according to a Johns Hopkins engineering model, up to 10 million people may lose electricity in the mid-Atlantic over the next week.  Utilities are already staffing up and hiring external contractors to assist in the storm recovery efforts.  State governors are declaring a state of emergency to waive limits on how many hours utility workers can drive and work, to allow workers from other states and Canadian provinces to assist.

Hurricane Sandy's effects on energy are not limited to electric infrastructure.  Petroleum refineries - and by extension oil and gas markets - will also be impacted by the storm. According to a situation report released this morning by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability, at least one petroleum refinery has already shut down.  Phillips 66's Linden, NJ refinery has shut down its production; the Linden refinery is capable of producing 238,000 barrels per day.

The report also cites trade press reports indicating reduced production at two other mid-Atlantic oil refineries, Philadelphia Energy Solutions’ Philadelphia, PA refinery (335,000 b/d capacity) and PBF Energy’s Delaware City refinery (182,200 b/d capacity).  Hurricane Sandy's impacts to refineries are not limited to those processing crude oil; the report also cites reduced production rates at Hess Corporation’s Port Reading, NJ facility (70,000 b/d capacity), which processes gas oils to produce petroleum products.

Collectively, these refineries do not account for a significant portion of the nation's refining capacity.  However, the impacted facilities' concentration in the mid-Atlantic may temporarily raise gasoline prices in the mid-Atlantic and northeastern U.S.  A key factor affecting the extent of this price bump will be how quickly the refineries can return to full production.

When tomorrow morning comes, the storm's direct impacts will be well underway, as will restoration efforts.  Last year's October storm, Hurricane Irene, left many electric utility customers without power for over a week.  How will Sandy compare to Irene?

Renewables dominate new electric generating capacity

In September 2012, the United States added 433 megawatts of new utility-scale electric generating capacity - and according to a federal report, it all came from renewable resources.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's September 2012 energy infrastructure update provides a summary of recent developments of natural gas, hydropower, electric generation, and electric transmission facilities.  For electric generation, the report provides a breakdown of newly installed capacity by resource type.

According to the report, 5 wind projects came online in September, totaling 300 megawatts of capacity:

• EDF Group’s 140 MW Phase 1 Pacific Wind in Kern County, California
• Forsyth Street Advisor LLC’s 57.6 MW Phase 1 Horse Butt Wind Farm in Bonneville County, Idaho
• KODE Novus I LLC’s 80 MW Phase 1 Novus Wind Farm in Texas County, Oklahoma
• Fire Island Wind LLC’s 17.6 MW Phase 1 Fire Island Wind Project in Anchorage Borough, Alaska
• Kodiak Electric Association’s 4.5 MW Phase 2 Pillar Mountain Wind project expansion in Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska

Additionally, 18 solar projects came online in September, totaling 133 MW of capacity.  Among these are a number of projects earning "largest" ranks:

• NRG Energy & MidAmerican Renewables, LLC’s 50 MW Phase 5 Aqua Caliente Solar Project expansion in Yuma County, Arizona came online.  The expansion brings the Aqua Caliente Project's operational photovoltaic capacity to 250 MW, making it currently the largest photovoltaic facility in the country.
• Zongyi Solar America’s 20 MW Tinton Falls Solar in Monmouth County, New Jersey, the largest photovoltaic project in New Jersey
• Southern Sky Renewable Energy LLC’s 5.6 MW Canton Landfill Solar Project in Canton County, Massachusetts, the largest solar facility in New England

The report indicates that no fossil fuel-fired generation came online last month.  The growth in renewable energy may be due to a variety of factors, including a rush to get wind projects built before the federal production tax credit expires at the end of the year, state renewable portfolio standards, and future projections about the cost of traditional fuels.  Nevertheless, wind and solar remain relatively small players in the nation's energy mix, with 4.43% of the nation's total generating capacity coming from wind and only 0.29% coming from solar.  Still, the growth of these resources illustrates recent investment's focus on the renewable power sector.

NJ declares NRG Bluewater abandoned offshore wind project

Finding that the developer has abandoned the project, New Jersey regulators have withdrawn $3 million in financial support for an offshore wind project proposed by NRG Bluewater Wind. 

The U.S. and New Jersey flags, flying in the sea breeze at Cape May, NJ.

Bluewater Wind New Jersey Energy LLC proposed a 350 megawatt wind project off the New Jersey coast.  In 2008, the company won a $4 million grant from the state to install an offshore meteorological tower as part of a state-sponsored offshore wind grant solicitation.  The grant agreement required Bluewater to install the tower by 2010, and took the form of a rebate: if Bluewater installed the tower by the deadline, it would receive $4 million back from the state.

NRG Energy - a Fortune 250 wholesale power generation company controlling nearly 26 gigawatts of capacity - acquired Bluewater in 2009.  Also in 2009, Bluewater asked for and received a one-year extension of the met tower deadline.

In October 2010, Bluewater requested another extension, this time for two years.  Bluewater pointed to difficulties in obtaining federal permits for the project.  The NJ BPU granted the extension on April 27, 2011, requiring regular progress reporting and installation of the met towers by January 9, 2013.  The BPU also lowered the rebate amount to $3 million.

According to the BPU's October 4, 2012 order cancelling the rebate, Bluewater filed progress reports with the BPU in 2011 and January 2012, but ultimately stopped reporting.  But in December 2011, NRG announced that it was putting active development of offshore wind projects on hold.  By September 2012, BPU staff put NRG on notice that they planned to recommend that the Board cancel its rebate commitment "due to project abandonment and lack of reporting".  According to the BPU's order, "the company did not object or otherwise respond when advised of staff's recommendation to withdraw the rebate commitment".

As a result, last week the BPU found that the company had not complied with the order requiring status updates, and thus "that NRG Energy and Bluewater have abandoned the project and will not meet the rebate commitment requirements."  The Board cancelled the met tower rebate, and directed BPU staff to reallocate the funding to other New Jersey Clean Energy Programs.

National Park Service OKs transmission line on park lands

The National Park Service has given its final approval to a proposed high-voltage electric transmission line that would cross public lands in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, including the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, the Middle Delaware National Scenic and Recreational River as well as the Appalachian National Scenic Trail.

The 500 kilovolt transmission line, known as the Susquehanna-Roseland line, has been proposed by utilities PPL Electric Utilities and Public Service Electric and Gas Co. It would run 145 miles from Susquehanna, Pennsylvania to Roseland, New Jersey.  Mid-Atlantic electric grid operator PJM, Inc. and national electric reliability organization NERC had called for the line to protect the grid's reliability by preventing existing power lines from facing overloaded conditions.  The line also received a fast-track review by federal agencies under the auspices of the Interagency Rapid Response Team for Transmission, a group formed to coordinate on an expedited review of transmission projects designed to increase grid reliability, integrate new renewable energy, and cut consumer costs.

While the line's route largely followed existing rights-of-way, environmentalists and park activists challenged the National Park Service's approval of expansions to the rights-of-way through these national parklands.  The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities' approval of the project was also challenged, on the grounds that the state board failed to give adequate consideration to non-transmission alternatives that could have met consumer demand, such as programs promoting demand response and energy efficiency.  That case remains pending.

On Monday, the National Park Service issued its record of decision approving the line (31-page PDF).  As a condition of approval, the NPS required the developing utilities to contribute at least $56 million to a
fund to mitigate the line's impacts on federal lands by purchasing or otherwise conserving land for public use, compensating for impacts to wetlands affected by the line, and funding cultural and historic preservation in the affected parks.

In a Facebook post issued yesterday, the New Jersey chapter of the Sierra Club vowed to challenge the NPS's approval of the line in court.  PPL and PSE&G plan to place the line in service by June 2015.