Google has announced an investment in six solar photovoltaic projects to its portfolio. The projects, located in California and Arizona, have a combined electric generating capacity of 106 megawatts. This deal illustrates the trend of renewable energy investments by data centers and other tech companies.
The projects are under development by Recurrent Energy. Five are located in Southern California, while the sixth is in Arizona. Google and investment firm KKR invested $400 million in the projects; Google's share is reportedly $80 million. The partners will sell the power produced by the facilities to local utilities including Southern California Edison.
Google announced that this represents its fourteenth investment in renewable energy since 2011. In 2010, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission granted market-based rate authority to Google subsidiary Google Energy LLC, enabling it to sell power at wholesale. Google has since entered into long-term agreements to purchase power from wind farms and other renewable generators.
Other tech companies are pursuing similar strategies. Earlier this month Microsoft announced a deal to purchase energy produced by a Texas wind farm for its data center in San Antonio. In September, eBay received market-based rate authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, allowing it to sell surplus power from its generators to the grid.
For consumers like Google with significant demand for power, developing on-site electric generation or entering into a long-term power purchase agreement can be cost-effective, either by reducing the cost of energy or by reducing its exposure to price volatility. Investments in renewable energy can also position companies for improved sustainability and "green" their public images. For these reasons, the trend of tech company investment in renewable energy infrastructure will likely continue for the foreseeable future.
Showing posts with label data center. Show all posts
Showing posts with label data center. Show all posts
Google invests in solar energy projects
Monday, November 18, 2013
Labels:
data center,
eBay,
FERC,
google,
investment,
KKR,
market-based rate,
Microsoft,
photovoltaic,
Recurrent,
solar,
Southern California Edison,
Texas
Wind to power Microsoft's Texas data center
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
Microsoft has agreed to purchase energy produced by a Texas wind farm to power its data center in San Antonio. The announcement, posted on the official blog of Microsoft's Sustainability Development Team, describes a 20-year power purchase agreement with RES Americas under which Microsoft will purchase all of the output of the 110 megawatt Keechi Wind project located about 280 miles north.
The power purchase agreement fits with Microsoft's stated commitment to carbon neutrality. Since 2012, Microsoft has imposed an internal fee on the use of carbon-based forms of energy; Microsoft uses that fee to make investments in alternative or carbon-neutral energy, such as this power purchase agreement.
The Keechi project will be owned and operated by RES Americas, a subsidiary of British company RES Ltd. RES Americas currently operates over 600 MW of renewable energy projects, and has a renewable energy construction portfolio that exceeds 6,500 MW and 64 projects, as well as 534 miles of transmission lines. Its Keechi project is expected to cost $200 million, and will feature 55 turbines expected to produce 430,000 megawatt hours of energy per year. (To put this figure in context, it could power up to 45,000 homes, or cover between 5 and 10 percent of Microsoft's total electricity consumption.) Construction is expected to begin in 2014, with the project going operational by June 2015.
Microsoft is not alone in promoting its use of renewable or alternative energy to power its data centers. In 2012 Google entered into an agreement to purchase the output of a wind farm in Oklahoma to power its Pryor data center. Apple's new data center in Maiden, North Carolina is powered in part by a solar photovoltaic array and a biogas-fed fuel cell. eBay has proposed siting a 6 megawatt natural gas-fired fuel cell at its Utah data center. Whether the data center is powered by on-site distributed generation or buys power from a designated off-site renewable resource, the trend is toward promoting cleaner, greener computing through these arrangements. These choices may help the companies with cost control and power reliability as well as public relations.
Will large consumers of electricity continue to invest in alternative or renewable electric generation? If so, will they favor arms-length power purchase agreements with developers of remote projects, or will they rely more heavily on on-campus development of distributed generation? Will this trend spread beyond the big names so far - Microsoft, Apple, Google, and eBay - to the point where smaller or less tech-oriented companies develop or do similar projects and deals?
The power purchase agreement fits with Microsoft's stated commitment to carbon neutrality. Since 2012, Microsoft has imposed an internal fee on the use of carbon-based forms of energy; Microsoft uses that fee to make investments in alternative or carbon-neutral energy, such as this power purchase agreement.
The Keechi project will be owned and operated by RES Americas, a subsidiary of British company RES Ltd. RES Americas currently operates over 600 MW of renewable energy projects, and has a renewable energy construction portfolio that exceeds 6,500 MW and 64 projects, as well as 534 miles of transmission lines. Its Keechi project is expected to cost $200 million, and will feature 55 turbines expected to produce 430,000 megawatt hours of energy per year. (To put this figure in context, it could power up to 45,000 homes, or cover between 5 and 10 percent of Microsoft's total electricity consumption.) Construction is expected to begin in 2014, with the project going operational by June 2015.
Microsoft is not alone in promoting its use of renewable or alternative energy to power its data centers. In 2012 Google entered into an agreement to purchase the output of a wind farm in Oklahoma to power its Pryor data center. Apple's new data center in Maiden, North Carolina is powered in part by a solar photovoltaic array and a biogas-fed fuel cell. eBay has proposed siting a 6 megawatt natural gas-fired fuel cell at its Utah data center. Whether the data center is powered by on-site distributed generation or buys power from a designated off-site renewable resource, the trend is toward promoting cleaner, greener computing through these arrangements. These choices may help the companies with cost control and power reliability as well as public relations.
Will large consumers of electricity continue to invest in alternative or renewable electric generation? If so, will they favor arms-length power purchase agreements with developers of remote projects, or will they rely more heavily on on-campus development of distributed generation? Will this trend spread beyond the big names so far - Microsoft, Apple, Google, and eBay - to the point where smaller or less tech-oriented companies develop or do similar projects and deals?
Googa 20-year power purchase agreement (PPA) for wind energy in Texas that
will be funded in part by proceeds from Microsoft’s carbon fee - See
more at:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft-green/archive/2013/11/04/microsoft-signing-long-term-deal-to-buy-wind-energy-in-texas.aspx#sthash.4l62oNbo.dpuf
a 20-year power purchase agreement (PPA) for wind energy in Texas that
will be funded in part by proceeds from Microsoft’s carbon fee - See
more at:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft-green/archive/2013/11/04/microsoft-signing-long-term-deal-to-buy-wind-energy-in-texas.aspx#sthash.4l62oNbo.dpuf
a 20-year power purchase agreement (PPA) for wind energy in Texas that
will be funded in part by proceeds from Microsoft’s carbon fee - See
more at:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft-green/archive/2013/11/04/microsoft-signing-long-term-deal-to-buy-wind-energy-in-texas.aspx#sthash.4l62oNbo.dpuf
Labels:
Apple,
biogas,
carbon,
data center,
eBay,
fee,
fuel cell,
Keechi,
Microsoft,
North Carolina,
Oklahoma,
on-site generation,
photovoltaic,
power purchase agreement,
PPA,
Renewable,
RES Americas,
solar,
Texas,
Utah
eBay OKed for wholesale electricity sales
Friday, September 13, 2013
As customer-sited electric generation becomes increasingly economic, major companies outside the energy sector are entering electricity markets. Federal regulators this month granted eBay Inc.'s request for authorization to sell electricity at wholesale. What does this mean?
U.S. wholesale electricity markets are generally regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Most sellers in those markets are regulated as public utilities - but in recent years, the category of "utilities" has expanded beyond the traditional vertically-integrated utility serving retail customers with electricity. The growth in this sector has come largely from end-users of electricity who have developed on-site generation to meet their needs - and to sell excess power into wholesale markets. Recent big-name entries into the wholesale electricity market include Google Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. - and now eBay.
On September 5, 2013, the Commission granted eBay market-based rate authority. This approval enables eBay to sell electric energy, capacity, and other products. As described in the Commission's order, eBay plans to own and operate a 6 megawatt fuel cell generation facility located at its data center in South Jordan, Utah. In a June 21 filing, eBay described plans to install five natural gas-fueled "Bloom Box" units at the data center to provide power to run the facility.
eBay's plans bear some resemblance to the fuel cell system Apple developed at its data center in Maiden, North Carolina. Data centers consume significant amounts of energy, both for processing and for cooling. In many cases, on-site generation projects offer data centers a way to cut costs while improving their reliability and their environmental footprint.
Maximizing the cost-effectiveness of a distributed generation project requires it to be sized appropriately for the load to be served. In some applications, there may be little to no excess power available for sale at wholesale to the grid, while other on-site generation projects may be capable of exporting significant amounts of energy to the grid. With its market-based rate authorization in hand, eBay stands ready to enter the wholesale market with any excess power its Utah fuel cells produce.
U.S. wholesale electricity markets are generally regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Most sellers in those markets are regulated as public utilities - but in recent years, the category of "utilities" has expanded beyond the traditional vertically-integrated utility serving retail customers with electricity. The growth in this sector has come largely from end-users of electricity who have developed on-site generation to meet their needs - and to sell excess power into wholesale markets. Recent big-name entries into the wholesale electricity market include Google Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. - and now eBay.
On September 5, 2013, the Commission granted eBay market-based rate authority. This approval enables eBay to sell electric energy, capacity, and other products. As described in the Commission's order, eBay plans to own and operate a 6 megawatt fuel cell generation facility located at its data center in South Jordan, Utah. In a June 21 filing, eBay described plans to install five natural gas-fueled "Bloom Box" units at the data center to provide power to run the facility.
eBay's plans bear some resemblance to the fuel cell system Apple developed at its data center in Maiden, North Carolina. Data centers consume significant amounts of energy, both for processing and for cooling. In many cases, on-site generation projects offer data centers a way to cut costs while improving their reliability and their environmental footprint.
Maximizing the cost-effectiveness of a distributed generation project requires it to be sized appropriately for the load to be served. In some applications, there may be little to no excess power available for sale at wholesale to the grid, while other on-site generation projects may be capable of exporting significant amounts of energy to the grid. With its market-based rate authorization in hand, eBay stands ready to enter the wholesale market with any excess power its Utah fuel cells produce.
Labels:
Apple,
Bloom box,
data center,
distributed generation,
eBay,
export,
FERC,
google,
Maiden,
market-based rate,
on-site generation,
Utah,
Wal-Mart
Biogas at Apple's NC data center
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Continuing to look at Apple's plans for energy supply at its data center in Maiden, North Carolina:
This spring a series of filings by Apple to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission gave the public some insight into Apple's planned electric generation facilities at the Maiden data center, home to Apple's iCloud service. (See Tuesday's blog entry for a look at its solar photovoltaic project, and Wednesday's entry for its fuel cell project.)
Fuel cells convert fuels into electricity through a chemical process that does not rely on combustion. According to one of Apple's filings with FERC, Apple plans to use biogas to power its fuel cells:
This spring a series of filings by Apple to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission gave the public some insight into Apple's planned electric generation facilities at the Maiden data center, home to Apple's iCloud service. (See Tuesday's blog entry for a look at its solar photovoltaic project, and Wednesday's entry for its fuel cell project.)
Fuel cells convert fuels into electricity through a chemical process that does not rely on combustion. According to one of Apple's filings with FERC, Apple plans to use biogas to power its fuel cells:
The Systems will be fueled with biogas that will be transported via a natural gas pipeline system. To be injected into the natural gas pipeline system and qualify as pipeline-grade gas, biogas must meet strict heat content and quality requirements. Consequently, raw biogas must be upgraded (i.e., cleaned and separated to remove components such as hydrogen sulfide, chlorine, and sulfur and to increase methane content) prior to being injected into a pipeline. Once injected into the pipeline system, it comingles with conventional natural gas and is indistinguishable from conventional natural gas in terms of safety and burning quality. The biogas, having been upgraded/cleaned to pipeline-quality and then injected into the natural gas pipeline system displaces a comparable quantity of conventional natural gas.
The volume and heat content of the biogas will be measured at a utility-grade meter at the point of injection. The biogas will then enter the natural gas pipeline infrastructure that has an established balancing measurement system regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission). The biogas will be nominated for the Facility in accordance with the pipeline’s posted business practices and relevant Commission requirements. Not only the contract and purchase of biogas, but also the nomination process demonstrates compliance with 18 C.F.R. § 292.204 (b). A utility-grade meter at the Facility will measure actual gas consumption by the Facility. A revenue-grade meter will measure electricity generated by the Facility.
Furthermore, because the biogas can be upgraded to flow in a pipeline system and nominated for a particular facility, it allows for flexibility in the location of the generating unit. This flexibility will provide for increased efficiency (operational and maintenance), enhanced reliability, and improved land use. These benefits were recognized by the North Carolina Utilities Commission (“NCUC”). The NCUC ruled that biogas fuel, which is derived from a renewable energy resource, cleaned to pipeline quality, injected into the pipeline system and nominated for an electric generation facility within the state of North Carolina, is a renewable energy resource known as “Directed Biogas” (NCUC Order Issued March 21, 2012, in docket SP 100, Sub 29).
This Facility is in keeping with the stated reasons for the implementation of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), specifically the increased conservation of electric energy, increased efficiency in the use of facility and resources by electric utilities, and the conservation of natural gas. In the case of this Facility, the use of biogas, which displaces conventional natural gas, to generate electricity will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and smog forming pollutants while also diversifying the fuel used to generate electricity. The Systems that make up this Facility consume less fuel and produce less CO2 than other technologies. Each System emits less than 0.07 lbs/MW-hr of NOx , negligible SOx, less than 0.10 lbs/MW-hr of CO and less than 0.02 lbs/MW-hr of VOC. Additionally, the Systems require very little water, with an average usage of approximately 0.00001 gallons/kWh. The low carbon footprint, de minimus criteria pollutants, small land use and negligible water use, make this Facility a prime example of an initiative that furthers the Commission’s stated goal of increasing renewable energy and investing in environmentally beneficial technologies.
Labels:
Apple,
biogas,
Bloom box,
data center,
fuel cell,
Maiden,
North Carolina,
photovoltaic,
PV,
solar
Apple's Maiden, NC fuel cell project
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Following on yesterday's look at Apple's planned solar photovoltaic system for its Maiden, North Carolina data center, here's a look at the fuel cell project Apple is also planning the Maiden facility.
A public filing Apple made last month to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission describes the Maiden data center's proposed fuel cell system. The filing represents Apple's self-certification that the fuel cell project meets the standards of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) of 1978 as a "qualifying facility", setting the facility up for incentives that could include the right to require Duke Energy Carolinas to buy its output.
Apple's fuel cell self-certification filing, docketed by FERC as QF12-327, describes the project:
Tomorrow, a look at the innovative fuel Apple proposes to use to power these fuel cells.
A public filing Apple made last month to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission describes the Maiden data center's proposed fuel cell system. The filing represents Apple's self-certification that the fuel cell project meets the standards of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) of 1978 as a "qualifying facility", setting the facility up for incentives that could include the right to require Duke Energy Carolinas to buy its output.
Apple's fuel cell self-certification filing, docketed by FERC as QF12-327, describes the project:
The Facility will consist of 24 fuel cell systems (“Systems”) using a patented solid oxide fuel cell technology to generate electricity. A single fuel cell consists of an anode, a cathode and an electrolyte placed between the two electrodes. As fuel flows in through the anode side and an oxidant comes in over the cathode, a reaction is triggered that causes electrons to move into the fuel cell’s circuit, producing electricity.
Each System consists of thousands of fuel cells stacked together. Multiple stacks are aggregated together into a "power module", and then multiple power modules, along with a common fuel input and electrical output are assembled as a complete system. Each System is approximately the size of a standard parking space and will produce approximately 200 kW of power. The Systems have a modular design that allows the simultaneous use of multiple Systems in order to achieve the desired electric generation output. Each 200 kW (AC) System is comprised of six individual direct current (DC) power-producing modules and one input/output module for fuel intake and electricity output. Each of the six individual DC power producing modules is feeding electricity to the input/output module which converts the DC power into the systems AC power output. The combination of six DC modules and one input/output module comprise a 200 kW (AC) all-electric System. Each System has a net baseload generating capacity of 200 kW (AC). The total generating capacity of the Facility will be approximately 4.8 MW (AC).The "patented solid oxide fuel cell technology to generate electricity" in this description is reported to be Bloom Energy's Bloom box technology.
Tomorrow, a look at the innovative fuel Apple proposes to use to power these fuel cells.
Labels:
Apple,
biogas,
Bloom box,
data center,
fuel cell,
Maiden,
North Carolina,
photovoltaic,
PV,
solar
Apple's Maiden NC solar project
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
As Apple continues to develop a data center to handle its iCloud service, some details are emerging about the energy infrastructure to be built at the Maiden, North Carolina facility. Two public filings Apple made last month to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission describe the Maiden data center's solar photovoltaic and fuel cell systems.
Under federal law, certain efficient or renewable electricity generation facilities can certify themselves as "qualifying facilities" or QFs. The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) of 1978 required monopolistic electric utilities to buy power from QFs, as long as that cost was less than the utility's own "avoided cost". Generally, a utility's avoided cost is the cost of the power the utility would have procured from a source other than the QF in question. This policy was intended to improve the efficiency of the nation's fleet of electric generation, as lower-cost QFs displaced more expensive traditional utility generation.
In April, Apple submitted two filings to FERC certifying its planned Maiden solar and fuel cell systems as QFs. These documents provide additional insight into Apple's plans.
In its solar photovoltaic project self-certification, docketed by FERC as QF12-328, Apple described the project:
Check out tomorrow's blog entry for a look at Apple's biogas fuel cell facility.
Under federal law, certain efficient or renewable electricity generation facilities can certify themselves as "qualifying facilities" or QFs. The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) of 1978 required monopolistic electric utilities to buy power from QFs, as long as that cost was less than the utility's own "avoided cost". Generally, a utility's avoided cost is the cost of the power the utility would have procured from a source other than the QF in question. This policy was intended to improve the efficiency of the nation's fleet of electric generation, as lower-cost QFs displaced more expensive traditional utility generation.
In April, Apple submitted two filings to FERC certifying its planned Maiden solar and fuel cell systems as QFs. These documents provide additional insight into Apple's plans.
In its solar photovoltaic project self-certification, docketed by FERC as QF12-328, Apple described the project:
Each of the photovoltaic installations will consist of multiple 435-watt photovoltaic modules on ground-mounted single-axis tracking systems. The current design includes 57,360 435-watt modules. The modules will be connected in series strings of 10 to achieve the appropriate DC voltage. The modules will track the sun by rotating about a north-south axis. At the current time, we expect 14 photovoltaic installations will make up the solar farm: ten 1.50 MW installations and four 1.25 MW installations. The final number of installations and modules will depend on detailed design considerations in consultation with the utility, the photovoltaic system provider, and local permitting authorities. Each installation will be connected to two 750 kW or two 625 kW inverters. Inverters will convert the DC current produced by the systems to AC current. A step up transformer is installed between the inverter outputs and the point of connection to Duke's distribution system. Each installation has a dedicated transformer. The photovoltaic installations will be installed in a phased manner, whereby the installations will be interconnected as they are completed.
Check out tomorrow's blog entry for a look at Apple's biogas fuel cell facility.
Labels:
Apple,
biogas,
Bloom box,
data center,
fuel cell,
Maiden,
North Carolina,
photovoltaic,
PV,
solar
Debate over data center green claims
Friday, April 20, 2012
How green is Apple's iCloud data storage service? That question provoked debate this week, as environmental activism group Greenpeace released a report critical of Apple's choices of power supply for its data center in Maiden, North Carolina, where the iCloud storage is based.
Greenpeace's report, How Clean is Your Cloud (52-page PDF), notes the explosive growth of cloud-based data and computing services offered by companies like Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Google,
and Yahoo. These services are made possible by data centers, centralized networks of servers and computer infrastructure. As Greenpeace put it, "Data centers are the factories of the 21st century information age, containing thousands of computers that store and manage our rapidly growing collection of data for consumption at a moment’s notice."
Data centers can be major consumers of electricity, needing cooling and air handling as well as energy for raw processing operations. Some data center operators seek out renewable electricity, while others are developing on-site generation. Most work to improve their energy efficiency, making the best possible use of the energy they need.
Apple has touted the green credentials of its Maiden data center, which was designed to earn LEED Platinum certification from the U.S. Green Building Council. Apple's Maiden facility will also include a 20 MW solar facility on land adjacent to the data center, as well as a 5 MW biogas-based fuel cell system, systems Apple describes as "the nation’s largest end user-owned solar array" and "the largest nonutility fuel cell installation in the United States."
Greenpeace's report notes that despite these investments, Apple's data center is located in an area where utilities source a significant amount of power from coal-fired power plants. Greenpeace and Apple dispute how much power the Maiden plant will consume (differing by as much as a factor of 5), and thus what fraction of its electricity will be produced from renewable on-site generation.
Whatever the facts may be, the debate illustrates society's interest in the environmental impacts of our technological choices - as well as the difficulty in evaluating some claims of greenness.
Greenpeace's report, How Clean is Your Cloud (52-page PDF), notes the explosive growth of cloud-based data and computing services offered by companies like Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Google,
and Yahoo. These services are made possible by data centers, centralized networks of servers and computer infrastructure. As Greenpeace put it, "Data centers are the factories of the 21st century information age, containing thousands of computers that store and manage our rapidly growing collection of data for consumption at a moment’s notice."
Data centers can be major consumers of electricity, needing cooling and air handling as well as energy for raw processing operations. Some data center operators seek out renewable electricity, while others are developing on-site generation. Most work to improve their energy efficiency, making the best possible use of the energy they need.
Apple has touted the green credentials of its Maiden data center, which was designed to earn LEED Platinum certification from the U.S. Green Building Council. Apple's Maiden facility will also include a 20 MW solar facility on land adjacent to the data center, as well as a 5 MW biogas-based fuel cell system, systems Apple describes as "the nation’s largest end user-owned solar array" and "the largest nonutility fuel cell installation in the United States."
Greenpeace's report notes that despite these investments, Apple's data center is located in an area where utilities source a significant amount of power from coal-fired power plants. Greenpeace and Apple dispute how much power the Maiden plant will consume (differing by as much as a factor of 5), and thus what fraction of its electricity will be produced from renewable on-site generation.
Whatever the facts may be, the debate illustrates society's interest in the environmental impacts of our technological choices - as well as the difficulty in evaluating some claims of greenness.
Labels:
Apple,
biogas,
data center,
energy efficiency,
Facebook,
fuel cell,
Greenpeace,
Maiden,
North Carolina,
solar
Cooling data centers with recycled water
Monday, March 19, 2012
Data centers are cropping up around the country, providing centralized computer server and storage capacity for both internet superstars like Google and Facebook as well as a much longer list of brick-and-mortar businesses. Data centers can consume significant amounts of electricity, so data center owners work hard to manage their energy costs and improve their energy efficiency.
Much of a data center's energy budget goes to keeping the servers and the building's airspace cool. Traditionally, this might include mechanical chillers -- effectively, powerful air conditioning units. To manage energy costs and environmental footprints, some data centers are turning to more passive cooling resources. Google recently announced that it is using recycled gray water from a local public water treatment facility to cool its data center in Douglas County, Georgia.
The Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority collects wastewater from local communities, treats it, and releases it into the Chattahoochee River. Google worked with the water and sewer authority to divert up to 30% of the water that would otherwise flow into the river to a special side-stream treatment plant. Once cleaned, this water is piped about 5 miles to Google's data center, where it is used for cooling.
Google's data center relies primarily on evaporative cooling. It takes energy to evaporate liquid water; as a consequence, you can use evaporating water to remove heat from air or other materials. (Think of the cooling effect of a dry breeze on wet skin.) Much of the water evaporates through this cooling process; Google sends any remaining cooling water to an on-site effluent treatment plant, from which the water is returned to the Chattahoochee River.
Using recycled water to cool data centers can save energy compared to mechanical chillers. Where clean water is scarce or expensive, the ability to use recycled water for cooling could also open up new capacity for data centers. Will more data centers turn to recycled gray water for evaporative cooling and energy cost management?
Much of a data center's energy budget goes to keeping the servers and the building's airspace cool. Traditionally, this might include mechanical chillers -- effectively, powerful air conditioning units. To manage energy costs and environmental footprints, some data centers are turning to more passive cooling resources. Google recently announced that it is using recycled gray water from a local public water treatment facility to cool its data center in Douglas County, Georgia.
The Douglasville-Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority collects wastewater from local communities, treats it, and releases it into the Chattahoochee River. Google worked with the water and sewer authority to divert up to 30% of the water that would otherwise flow into the river to a special side-stream treatment plant. Once cleaned, this water is piped about 5 miles to Google's data center, where it is used for cooling.
Google's data center relies primarily on evaporative cooling. It takes energy to evaporate liquid water; as a consequence, you can use evaporating water to remove heat from air or other materials. (Think of the cooling effect of a dry breeze on wet skin.) Much of the water evaporates through this cooling process; Google sends any remaining cooling water to an on-site effluent treatment plant, from which the water is returned to the Chattahoochee River.
Using recycled water to cool data centers can save energy compared to mechanical chillers. Where clean water is scarce or expensive, the ability to use recycled water for cooling could also open up new capacity for data centers. Will more data centers turn to recycled gray water for evaporative cooling and energy cost management?
Facebook data center power demand
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Facebook has revealed that its data center in Prineville, Oregon consumes 28 megawatts of electricity -- consistent with other comparably-sized data facilities, but a significant draw on the local electric grid. As data center operations grow, they will need reliable access to affordable electricity.
Data centers, which are centralized locations where computer servers store and process information, are in increasing demand. From managing the smart grid through real-time data collection and processing to managing information about online contacts, data centers support many of the activities consumers take for granted every day.
Fundamentally composed of electronic data storage and processing equipment, data centers can consume significant amounts of electricity. Managing the cost and environmental impacts of that power consumption is important to many data center operators. Some, like Google, have chosen to source renewable power for their data centers. Others pursue improved energy efficiency for their data centers.
In Facebook's case, the initial 300,000 square foot facility reportedly consumes up to 28 megawatts of power. By comparison, all of the other businesses and homes in Crook County reportedly consume just 30 megawatts of power, meaning Facebook's data center could already consume about half of the electricity in the region. Future phases might roughly triple that electricity consumption, and other businesses and governmental entities are considering siting data centers near Prineville's location in central Oregon.
Data centers, which are centralized locations where computer servers store and process information, are in increasing demand. From managing the smart grid through real-time data collection and processing to managing information about online contacts, data centers support many of the activities consumers take for granted every day.
Fundamentally composed of electronic data storage and processing equipment, data centers can consume significant amounts of electricity. Managing the cost and environmental impacts of that power consumption is important to many data center operators. Some, like Google, have chosen to source renewable power for their data centers. Others pursue improved energy efficiency for their data centers.
In Facebook's case, the initial 300,000 square foot facility reportedly consumes up to 28 megawatts of power. By comparison, all of the other businesses and homes in Crook County reportedly consume just 30 megawatts of power, meaning Facebook's data center could already consume about half of the electricity in the region. Future phases might roughly triple that electricity consumption, and other businesses and governmental entities are considering siting data centers near Prineville's location in central Oregon.
Labels:
Crook County,
data center,
energy efficiency,
Facebook,
google,
Oregon,
Prineville,
Renewable
Google grows wind power supply
Monday, January 16, 2012
Google Energy LLC, a subsidiary of internet search company Google Inc., recently informed federal regulators of a long-term power purchase agreement with a 100.8-megawatt wind-powered electric generation project in Oklahoma.
Under the deal, Google agreed to buy all of the energy output from Minco Wind II, LLC's wind project for a term of 20 years. Minco Wind II is operated by a subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources. As part of the deal, Google can claim that it is powering a data center in Pryor, OK, with power from the wind project.
The Oklahoma PPA nearly doubles the amount of wind capacity under contract by Google. In 2010, Google Energy entered into a power purchase agreement to buy 114 MW of wind from Garden Wind, LLC. Garden Wind, also a NextEra subsidiary, owns and operates a 150 MW wind project in Iowa. Garden Wind sold Google Energy a 76% share of the project's output for a term of 20 years. In addition, Google indirectly owns a 20.5% interest in Peace Garden Wind, LLC, which owns and operates about 169 MW of wind generation in the central region.
This comes two months after Google announced it was scaling back its program aimed at making renewable energy cost less than coal. Google's RE
Under the deal, Google agreed to buy all of the energy output from Minco Wind II, LLC's wind project for a term of 20 years. Minco Wind II is operated by a subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources. As part of the deal, Google can claim that it is powering a data center in Pryor, OK, with power from the wind project.
The Oklahoma PPA nearly doubles the amount of wind capacity under contract by Google. In 2010, Google Energy entered into a power purchase agreement to buy 114 MW of wind from Garden Wind, LLC. Garden Wind, also a NextEra subsidiary, owns and operates a 150 MW wind project in Iowa. Garden Wind sold Google Energy a 76% share of the project's output for a term of 20 years. In addition, Google indirectly owns a 20.5% interest in Peace Garden Wind, LLC, which owns and operates about 169 MW of wind generation in the central region.
This comes two months after Google announced it was scaling back its program aimed at making renewable energy cost less than coal. Google's RE
Labels:
data center,
google,
long-term contract,
NextEra,
power purchase agreement,
PPA,
Renewable,
wind
Data center energy use, consolidation
Thursday, January 5, 2012
Data centers - centralized locations where computer servers store and process information - play a key role in the function of society today. Demand for data center capacity is growing, as more and more digital information is collected and used to refine our technological experiences. For example, the growth of a smart electric grid relies in part on real-time data collection and analysis on a massive scale.
Data centers consume significant amounts of energy, primarily in the form of electricity. Progress in computer energy efficiency has reduced data centers' electricity consumption per unit of capacity, but the overall growth of data center capacity means they consume more and more electricity every year. Some data centers choose to buy renewable energy to serve their needs. In addition, data centers typically need cooling capacity, creating additional energy demand.
Energy costs are driving some data centers to consolidate. For example, many data centers in the U.S. serve federal agencies. In 2010, the federal government began a major effort to consolidate data centers and close unneeded facilities. The Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative is designed to promote "Green IT" principles by reducing the overall energy and real estate footprints of government data centers and reduce data center costs. If the initiative succeeds in its mission, it will shift investment towards more efficient technologies. Another anticipated benefit of consolidating data centers is enhanced IT security.
As the initiative developed, agencies identified 3,133 federal data centers -- nearly three times as many as the nation's Chief Information Officer initially posited. This growth is due in part to a broadened threshold for what counts as a data center, but also reflects imperfect information about total federal assets. Of these facilities, the initiative now plans to close roughly 40%, or at least 1,200 data center locations. According to the CIO's list, 525 will be closed by the end of 2012.
Many of the surplus facilities pruned off by the federal data center consolidation initiative may continue life in the private sector. New owners may succeed if they can manage these data centers' energy consumption and benefit from participation in creative energy strategies like demand response or net metering distributed generation.
Data centers consume significant amounts of energy, primarily in the form of electricity. Progress in computer energy efficiency has reduced data centers' electricity consumption per unit of capacity, but the overall growth of data center capacity means they consume more and more electricity every year. Some data centers choose to buy renewable energy to serve their needs. In addition, data centers typically need cooling capacity, creating additional energy demand.
Energy costs are driving some data centers to consolidate. For example, many data centers in the U.S. serve federal agencies. In 2010, the federal government began a major effort to consolidate data centers and close unneeded facilities. The Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative is designed to promote "Green IT" principles by reducing the overall energy and real estate footprints of government data centers and reduce data center costs. If the initiative succeeds in its mission, it will shift investment towards more efficient technologies. Another anticipated benefit of consolidating data centers is enhanced IT security.
As the initiative developed, agencies identified 3,133 federal data centers -- nearly three times as many as the nation's Chief Information Officer initially posited. This growth is due in part to a broadened threshold for what counts as a data center, but also reflects imperfect information about total federal assets. Of these facilities, the initiative now plans to close roughly 40%, or at least 1,200 data center locations. According to the CIO's list, 525 will be closed by the end of 2012.
Many of the surplus facilities pruned off by the federal data center consolidation initiative may continue life in the private sector. New owners may succeed if they can manage these data centers' energy consumption and benefit from participation in creative energy strategies like demand response or net metering distributed generation.
Computer energy efficiency increases
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Computers can do amazing things, but are often viewed as consuming significant amounts of energy. For example, centralized server operations like large data centers can consume as much power as heavy industrial manufacturing. Whether powered by the default electricity mix or by purely renewable power, we often think that crunching numbers on computers means using a lot of power. For this reason, computer makers and customers alike push for energy efficiency in their computing activities.
Newly published research suggests that the energy efficiency of computers doubles roughly every 18 months. A team of researchers led by Stanford professor Jonathan Koomey looked at the peak power consumption of electronic computing devices ranging from 1946's ENIAC to the present. ENIAC, which the U.S. Army used to calculate trajectories for artillery, took up 1,800 square feet (bigger than the average U.S. house at the time), and could consume up to 150 kilowatts of electricity. Modern computers, and even smart phones, can now outperform ENIAC when it comes to computation, but are much more efficient in terms of their power demanded to perform a fixed set of calculations. According to what is now being called "Koomey's Law", over the years since ENIAC first powered up, computers' energy efficiency on that basis has doubled roughly every 18 months.
This finding follows on Professor Koomey's July 2011 report on data center energy usage, which found that although data centers consume more and more electricity each year, their energy consumption is growing less than their increase in server power.
Newly published research suggests that the energy efficiency of computers doubles roughly every 18 months. A team of researchers led by Stanford professor Jonathan Koomey looked at the peak power consumption of electronic computing devices ranging from 1946's ENIAC to the present. ENIAC, which the U.S. Army used to calculate trajectories for artillery, took up 1,800 square feet (bigger than the average U.S. house at the time), and could consume up to 150 kilowatts of electricity. Modern computers, and even smart phones, can now outperform ENIAC when it comes to computation, but are much more efficient in terms of their power demanded to perform a fixed set of calculations. According to what is now being called "Koomey's Law", over the years since ENIAC first powered up, computers' energy efficiency on that basis has doubled roughly every 18 months.
This finding follows on Professor Koomey's July 2011 report on data center energy usage, which found that although data centers consume more and more electricity each year, their energy consumption is growing less than their increase in server power.
Labels:
computer,
data center,
Koomey
March 11, 2011 - powering data centers with renewable energy
Friday, March 11, 2011
What happens when you combine customer choice, voluntary renewable power markets, and electricity-hungry data center?
Data centers house computer systems for things like telecommunications and storage of large amounts of digital information. I've written before about how much energy data centers can consume: in the case of the National Security Agency's Utah Data Center, estimates suggest up to 65 megawatts of electricity at any given time. This demand for electricity can drive data centers to locate or relocate themselves in areas of lower power pricing.
Another possibility is for data centers to choose their electricity sources not based on pricing but on other characteristics, such as the sustainability of the power generated. For example, IT services company Datapipe, Inc. recently chose to buy all its power for its US facilities from renewable sources. This won them Leadership Club status in EPA's Green Power Partners program. Datapipe buys almost 56,000,000 kilowatt-hours per year, all of which it now sources from renewable generation. Assuming they run at an even electricity load 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, that's an average of 6.4 megawatts of demand. While that's less than the Utah Data Center's anticipated consumption, it's impressive to see a consumer choosing to buy 100% renewable electricity.
Data centers house computer systems for things like telecommunications and storage of large amounts of digital information. I've written before about how much energy data centers can consume: in the case of the National Security Agency's Utah Data Center, estimates suggest up to 65 megawatts of electricity at any given time. This demand for electricity can drive data centers to locate or relocate themselves in areas of lower power pricing.
Another possibility is for data centers to choose their electricity sources not based on pricing but on other characteristics, such as the sustainability of the power generated. For example, IT services company Datapipe, Inc. recently chose to buy all its power for its US facilities from renewable sources. This won them Leadership Club status in EPA's Green Power Partners program. Datapipe buys almost 56,000,000 kilowatt-hours per year, all of which it now sources from renewable generation. Assuming they run at an even electricity load 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, that's an average of 6.4 megawatts of demand. While that's less than the Utah Data Center's anticipated consumption, it's impressive to see a consumer choosing to buy 100% renewable electricity.
Labels:
costs,
data center,
EPA,
Green Power Partners,
sustainability,
Utah,
voluntary renewable
January 28, 2011 - Utah power prices
Friday, January 28, 2011
Earlier this month, I noted that low power prices in Utah are attracting development and jobs to that state. For example, the National Security Agency chose Utah to site a new 1 million square foot data center that may consume up to 65 megawatts of power - electricity that is generally cheaper in Utah than in many other states. (The EIA reports that the September 2010 average all-sector electricity price in Utah was just 7.42 cents per kWh, significantly below the U.S. average of 10.24 cents per kWh for that time period.)
Now, PacifiCorp, operating as Rocky Mountain Power in Utah, has requested permission from the Public Service Commission of Utah to increase prices by an overall average of 13.7 percent. Rocky Mountain Power describes this price request as "necessary to serve our Utah customers’ growing electricity needs and to comply with environmental requirements". In a 4-page PDF, Rocky Mountain Power points to increasing demand in Utah, and forecasts continued increases in demand based on forecasts of economic growth. (As I noted last year, energy consumption has traditionally been viewed as directly correlated to GDP.) Rocky Mountain Power states that building new facilities (generation and transmission) is more expensive than older facilities: "Our newest power plants are primarily natural gas and wind projects. While among the lowest cost options today, either one is about twice as expensive as the generating plants built in the 1970s and early 1980s." Finally, Rocky Mountain Power points out, "Compared with our largest industrial customers, the company’s returns are modest and in line with other electricity providers."
The Public Service Commission of Utah will now consider Rocky Mountain Power's request.
Now, PacifiCorp, operating as Rocky Mountain Power in Utah, has requested permission from the Public Service Commission of Utah to increase prices by an overall average of 13.7 percent. Rocky Mountain Power describes this price request as "necessary to serve our Utah customers’ growing electricity needs and to comply with environmental requirements". In a 4-page PDF, Rocky Mountain Power points to increasing demand in Utah, and forecasts continued increases in demand based on forecasts of economic growth. (As I noted last year, energy consumption has traditionally been viewed as directly correlated to GDP.) Rocky Mountain Power states that building new facilities (generation and transmission) is more expensive than older facilities: "Our newest power plants are primarily natural gas and wind projects. While among the lowest cost options today, either one is about twice as expensive as the generating plants built in the 1970s and early 1980s." Finally, Rocky Mountain Power points out, "Compared with our largest industrial customers, the company’s returns are modest and in line with other electricity providers."
The Public Service Commission of Utah will now consider Rocky Mountain Power's request.
January 7, 2011 - data center power demands
Friday, January 7, 2011
As the volume of digital data we create and consume increases, how much electricity is required to store, manage and analyze this information? Smart grid technology has been described as relying on the "internet of things", a vision becoming real of constant real-time data communications between interconnected devices like home appliances, heating systems, and vehicles and the overall power grid. This will represent a multifold increase in the volume of data being produced - and for those entities interested in analyzing that data, a likely increase in the volume of energy required to do so.
Even now, when smart grid communications are still a relatively small portion of the total volume of data flying around the country, it can take a surprisingly large amount of electricity to run a data storage and analysis center. In Utah, the National Security Agency has just broken ground for its Utah Data Center, a complex enclosing about 1 million square feet of space, 100,000 square feet of which will be devoted to computer hardware. Sen. Orrin Hatch has been quoted as describing the data center as creating 100 to 200 jobs for information technology specialists and engineers. The NSA describes the data center as a component of the Comprehensive National Cyber-security Initiative designed to help the intelligence community meet domestic cyber-security requirements.
So how much power will the Utah Data Center consume? Apparently up to 65 megawatts. Indeed, the availability and cost of that much power was one factor behind the siting of the facility in Utah. In 2006, the agency reportedly nearly consumed the entire free electric capacity of the Baltimore, Maryland power grid, causing the agency to look elsewhere for the installation of this new computing capacity. The relatively low cost of energy in Utah may also have been attractive; the EIA reports that the September 2010 average all-sector electricity price in Utah was just 7.42 cents per kWh, significantly below the U.S. average of 10.24 cents per kWh for that time period, let alone costlier markets like Washington, D.C. (13.74 cents/kWh), California (15.27 cents/kWh), or Connecticut (17.26 cents/kWh).
As society generates more and more data, can we expect to see more and more data centers? Will they consume more and more electricity? Because data can be directed to any geographic location, does this place areas with less expensive power at a relative advantage for the economic development opportunities posed by data centers?
Even now, when smart grid communications are still a relatively small portion of the total volume of data flying around the country, it can take a surprisingly large amount of electricity to run a data storage and analysis center. In Utah, the National Security Agency has just broken ground for its Utah Data Center, a complex enclosing about 1 million square feet of space, 100,000 square feet of which will be devoted to computer hardware. Sen. Orrin Hatch has been quoted as describing the data center as creating 100 to 200 jobs for information technology specialists and engineers. The NSA describes the data center as a component of the Comprehensive National Cyber-security Initiative designed to help the intelligence community meet domestic cyber-security requirements.
So how much power will the Utah Data Center consume? Apparently up to 65 megawatts. Indeed, the availability and cost of that much power was one factor behind the siting of the facility in Utah. In 2006, the agency reportedly nearly consumed the entire free electric capacity of the Baltimore, Maryland power grid, causing the agency to look elsewhere for the installation of this new computing capacity. The relatively low cost of energy in Utah may also have been attractive; the EIA reports that the September 2010 average all-sector electricity price in Utah was just 7.42 cents per kWh, significantly below the U.S. average of 10.24 cents per kWh for that time period, let alone costlier markets like Washington, D.C. (13.74 cents/kWh), California (15.27 cents/kWh), or Connecticut (17.26 cents/kWh).
As society generates more and more data, can we expect to see more and more data centers? Will they consume more and more electricity? Because data can be directed to any geographic location, does this place areas with less expensive power at a relative advantage for the economic development opportunities posed by data centers?
Labels:
California,
Connecticut,
cyber-security,
data center,
NSA,
price,
smart grid,
Utah
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
