Plans to generate electricity from offshore winds off the southern New England coast appear to be gathering some momentum, as a series of events unrolling this month favor offshore wind development.
On February 3, the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management took the initial steps in its process to lease sites for offshore wind projects in federal waters off Massachusetts. BOEM requested information about uses of an area of sea about about 12 nautical miles south of the islands of Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket, as well as expressions of interest by developers identifying particular sites. Responses to the call for information and nominations, as the key document is known, are due in mid-March.
Last week, Massachusetts officials announced a proposed settlement that would allow utilities NSTAR and Northeast Utilities to merge, but only on the condition that the resulting utility sign a long-term contract to buy power from the proposed Cape Wind project. Cape Wind already has a power purchase agreement with utility National Grid for half the project's output; if the NSTAR deal is approved, Cape Wind would have power purchase agreements in place for 77.5% of its expected output. Proponents hope that this increased certainty around the project's revenues could enable the project to be financed and built.
This week, Boston hosted a major offshore wind industry conference. Today, the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management plans to make an announcement "latest milestone in commercial wind energy planning and leasing
in the area of mutual interest offshore of Rhode Island and
Massachusetts."
None of these steps alone may be sufficient to spur offshore wind development in New England waters, but collectively these steps illustrate how multiple levels of government are promoting offshore wind. Will their collective result produce power in the near term?
Showing posts with label Northeast Utilities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Northeast Utilities. Show all posts
New England offshore wind advances
Friday, February 24, 2012
MA utility merger may help Cape Wind
Thursday, February 16, 2012
A $17.5 billion merger proposal by two Massachusetts utilities seems more likely to win regulatory approval after yesterday's announcement of a settlement that would provide offshore wind developer Cape Wind a buyer for more of its electricity.
The two utilities, NSTAR and Northeast Utilities, had asked the Department of Public Utilities to approve their merger, but the case dragged on and faced challenges from ratepayer advocates. Yesterday, Governor Deval Patrick announced that his administration had negotiated an agreement to settle the case. In exchange for allowing the merger, the proposed settlement contains a number of provisions that are said to create enhanced ratepayer benefit. For example, the utilities must provide customers a one-time credit totalling $21 milllion, and NSTAR must fund an independent audit of its returns and assets.
The proposed settlement would also require the merged utility to enter into a contract to buy part of the electricity to be produced by the Cape Wind offshore wind project. NSTAR would enter into a 15-year contract to purchase 129 MW, or about 27.5% of Cape Wind's projected electricity output. This would be on top of the agreement to sell National Grid buy half of Cape Wind's power for a price starting at 18.7 cents per kilowatt-hour. The terms of this agreement have yet to be approved by the DPU, but the settlement contemplates that NSTAR could look elsewhere for its renewable electricity if Cape Wind has not started physical construction by 2016. Buying power from an offshore wind project is seen as important in helping the utilities comply with the Green Communities Act and the Massachusetts renewable portfolio standard or RPS.
If the merger settlement is approved, the utility would then negotiate the terms of a power purchase agreement with Cape Wind and submit them to the DPU for approval. Would having signed PPAs for 77.5% of the project's output be enough for Cape Wind's project to be financed and built?
The two utilities, NSTAR and Northeast Utilities, had asked the Department of Public Utilities to approve their merger, but the case dragged on and faced challenges from ratepayer advocates. Yesterday, Governor Deval Patrick announced that his administration had negotiated an agreement to settle the case. In exchange for allowing the merger, the proposed settlement contains a number of provisions that are said to create enhanced ratepayer benefit. For example, the utilities must provide customers a one-time credit totalling $21 milllion, and NSTAR must fund an independent audit of its returns and assets.
The proposed settlement would also require the merged utility to enter into a contract to buy part of the electricity to be produced by the Cape Wind offshore wind project. NSTAR would enter into a 15-year contract to purchase 129 MW, or about 27.5% of Cape Wind's projected electricity output. This would be on top of the agreement to sell National Grid buy half of Cape Wind's power for a price starting at 18.7 cents per kilowatt-hour. The terms of this agreement have yet to be approved by the DPU, but the settlement contemplates that NSTAR could look elsewhere for its renewable electricity if Cape Wind has not started physical construction by 2016. Buying power from an offshore wind project is seen as important in helping the utilities comply with the Green Communities Act and the Massachusetts renewable portfolio standard or RPS.
If the merger settlement is approved, the utility would then negotiate the terms of a power purchase agreement with Cape Wind and submit them to the DPU for approval. Would having signed PPAs for 77.5% of the project's output be enough for Cape Wind's project to be financed and built?
Labels:
Cape Wind,
MA,
Massachusetts,
National Grid,
Northeast Utilities,
NStar,
offshore wind
August 4, 2011 - Northern Pass transmission project delayed
Thursday, August 4, 2011
For the past year, several large New England utilities have been collaborating on a major new transmission project to connect Canadian generators with New England markets. Northeast Utilities and NSTARhave proposed a high-voltage DC transmission line they call the "Northern Pass". If built as proposed, this $1.1 billion transmission line will be capable of sending about 1200 MW of power from Hydro-Quebec's generation network into New England. Canada, and Quebec in particular, possess many gigawatts of generation capacity, much of which comes from hydroelectricity.
In the meantime, some project opponents have expressed concerns about local siting issues related to the route the line will take through the White Mountain National Forest, other wild lands, and a number of communities. Between Groveton, NH, and the Canadian border, no transmission rights of way exist today, meaning about 40 miles of new transmission corridor are needed. Where this line should run has been a contentious issue. As a result, the developers have expressed a willingness to consider alternative routes.
At the same time, other opponents have observed that if gigawatts of Canadian renewable power are imported into New England to satisfy domestic renewable power mandates, the region will not see the more localized environmental and economic development benefits from the development of renewable power projects in New England. Many consider these local benefits key to the value of state renewable portfolio standards.
Now, the Northern Pass developers have announced that a rollback of the project's anticipated startup date to allow for a new route north of Groveton. On the project's journal website, Northern Pass now states that its "expected in-service date has been modified to 2016, with construction expected in the 2014 – 2016 time frame, compared to the initial range of 2013 – 2015".
In the meantime, some project opponents have expressed concerns about local siting issues related to the route the line will take through the White Mountain National Forest, other wild lands, and a number of communities. Between Groveton, NH, and the Canadian border, no transmission rights of way exist today, meaning about 40 miles of new transmission corridor are needed. Where this line should run has been a contentious issue. As a result, the developers have expressed a willingness to consider alternative routes.
At the same time, other opponents have observed that if gigawatts of Canadian renewable power are imported into New England to satisfy domestic renewable power mandates, the region will not see the more localized environmental and economic development benefits from the development of renewable power projects in New England. Many consider these local benefits key to the value of state renewable portfolio standards.
Now, the Northern Pass developers have announced that a rollback of the project's anticipated startup date to allow for a new route north of Groveton. On the project's journal website, Northern Pass now states that its "expected in-service date has been modified to 2016, with construction expected in the 2014 – 2016 time frame, compared to the initial range of 2013 – 2015".
April 11, 2011 - Northern Pass transmission
Monday, April 11, 2011
The Northern Pass project - a proposed high-voltage DC transmission line capable of sending about 1200 MW of power from Hydro-Quebec into New England - continues to be controversial. The $1.1 billion line from the Canadian border has been proposed by Public Service of New Hampshire's parent Northeast Utilities, along with utility NSTAR and Hydro-Quebec. These utilities promote the line as empowering New England markets to buy renewable power from Canada - primarily from Hydro-Quebec's nearly 40 gigawatts of hydro capacity. Opponents raise concerns both about local siting issues related to the line - which runs through the White Mountain National Forest and a number of communities - as well as about the impact of importing gigawatts of Canadian renewable power on the development of renewable power projects in New England.
Now, two of New Hampshire's Congressional delegation, Senator Kelly Ayotte and Representative Charles Bass, have sent a letter to Secretary of Energy Chu expressing opposition to the project in its current form based on the public hearings that have been held. They call on the Department of Energy to study alternatives to building towers along the Northern Pass's route through New Hampshire - alternatives like burying the lines or using existing rights-of-way. The Congressional delegation points to a need to protect New Hampshire's north country lands as "prime economic assets and pristine landscapes."
If the Northern Pass project is to be developed, proponents may have to navigate the political waters as well as the regulatory process.
Now, two of New Hampshire's Congressional delegation, Senator Kelly Ayotte and Representative Charles Bass, have sent a letter to Secretary of Energy Chu expressing opposition to the project in its current form based on the public hearings that have been held. They call on the Department of Energy to study alternatives to building towers along the Northern Pass's route through New Hampshire - alternatives like burying the lines or using existing rights-of-way. The Congressional delegation points to a need to protect New Hampshire's north country lands as "prime economic assets and pristine landscapes."
If the Northern Pass project is to be developed, proponents may have to navigate the political waters as well as the regulatory process.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)