A Maine sporting camp has proposed developing an off-grid micro-hydropower project to provide it electricity. Nicatous Lake Lodge and Cabins LLC proposes to develop the micro-hydro project at its remote property near Burlington, Maine. A filing made by the camp earlier this spring has triggered a federal review process to evaluate whether the project will require a license or exemption under the Federal Power Act.
Under federal law, most hydropower projects cannot be constructed, operated, or maintained without licensing under the Federal Power Act. But some projects -- typically off-grid or remote ones -- fall outside the Federal Power Act's jurisdiction. To reduce uncertainty about what regulations might apply, Section 23(b)(1) of the Federal Power Act requires an entity proposing a new project to file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission either a hydropower license application, or a Declaration of Intention to determine if the proposed
project requires a license.
When a developer files a Declaration of Intention with the Commission, the Federal Power Act requires the Commission to investigate and determine if the project would affect the interests of interstate or foreign commerce. The Commission also determines whether or not the project: (1) would be located on a navigable waterway; (2) would occupy public lands or reservations of the United States; (3) would utilize surplus water or water power from a government dam; or (4) would be located on a non-navigable stream over which Congress has Commerce Clause jurisdiction and would be constructed or enlarged after 1935. Each of these evaluations supports a key jurisdictional finding under the Federal Power Act; collectively, they can determine whether or not licensing is required.
Other recently proposed micro-hydro projects illustrate how the
Commission evaluates whether or not a license or exemption will be
required. For example, the Commission found that licensing or exemption
was required for the Patton Colorado Hydropower Project, which would be grid-tied -- but that no license is required for the Egnaczak Net Zero Hydro Project in Massachusetts, which would have no connection to the interstate electric grid.
This jurisdictional determination is now underway for the Nicatous micro-hydro project. On March 15, 2016, the sporting camp owner submitted a Declaration of Intention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. That Declaration of Intent describes the project site as about 15 miles away from the nearest electric utility grid, where Nicatous Stream leaves Nicatous Lake. The project does not rely on a dam, although the remains of a former dam are located nearby. Instead, an intake in the lake would supply water to a low head (60 inches or less) PowerPal micro-hydroelectric generator, rated at 1,000 watts power. Power from the generator would be fed into the lodge's electric system, not which is not connected to any utility grid.
On May 10, 2016, the Commission issued its notice of the filing, setting a 30-day deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to intervene. Commission action on the filing could follow later this year.
Showing posts with label lake. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lake. Show all posts
Nicatous Lodge proposes off-grid micro-hydro project
Monday, May 30, 2016
Labels:
23(b)(1),
declaration of intent,
exemption,
FPA,
hydro,
jurisdiction,
lake,
licensing,
Maine,
micro hydro,
Nicatous,
off grid,
stream
Alta Ski Area conduit micro-hydro project
Friday, May 27, 2016
Alta Ski Area has proposed developing a micro-hydropower project along an existing pipeline, and hopes to benefit from a streamlined regulatory process. Federal regulators have made a preliminary determination that the proposed Alta Micro-Hydro Project, in Alta, Utah, satisfies the requirements to be treated as a "qualifying conduit hydropower facility," which would not require licensing under the Federal Power Act.
Alta's proposed project would include a new powerhouse to be built along the existing underground 6-inch-diameter snowmaking water supply pipeline delivering water from Cecret Lake to the Wildcat Pump House, a new turbine/generating unit with an installed capacity of 75 kilowatts, intake and discharge pipes, and appurtenant facilities. The unit is estimated to generate between 115 and 225 megawatt-hours annually. There is no dam associated with the project. Alta presented its micro-hydro project as part of a 2012 request to update its master plan, which the U.S. Forest Service accepted.
Ski areas with snowmaking capacity typically have existing pipelines and water infrastructure, coupled with significant vertical relief. This can create opportunities to generate electricity using energy harvested from water flowing downhill through a pipeline, particularly if reducing system pressure (like a pressure relief valve) is otherwise needed.
A 2013 law was designed to help small conduit-based hydropower projects by eliminating their need for a license or exemption from licensing issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Section 4 of the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 amended Section 30 of the Federal Power Act. Section 30 now provides that a "qualifying conduit hydropower facility" -- one that is determined or deemed to meet defined criteria -- is not required to be licensed or exempted from licensing under the Federal Power Act. These criteria include:
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission administers this statute. To start the regulatory process, on May 16, 2016, Alta filed a notice of intent to construct a qualifying conduit hydropower facility. Alta supplemented its notice on May 20 to clarify that the project "will only operate when there is excess capacity available in the pipeline and when water is hydrologically available", generally after the winter snowmaking season, during spring runoff. Alta also restated that the pipeline's main purpose will continue to be snowmaking.
Yesterday the FERC issued its notice of preliminary determination of a qualifying conduit hydropower facility for Alta's project. That notice examines the project relative to each of the four statutory criteria, and then provides the Commission's preliminary determination:
Other recently proposed conduit hydro projects have been determined to be qualifying conduit hydropower facilities, including a Colorado project using an existing "ditch drop," a Castle Valley, Utah water treatment project, a California wholesale water agency conduit project, and a New Hampshire water works.
Alta's proposed project would include a new powerhouse to be built along the existing underground 6-inch-diameter snowmaking water supply pipeline delivering water from Cecret Lake to the Wildcat Pump House, a new turbine/generating unit with an installed capacity of 75 kilowatts, intake and discharge pipes, and appurtenant facilities. The unit is estimated to generate between 115 and 225 megawatt-hours annually. There is no dam associated with the project. Alta presented its micro-hydro project as part of a 2012 request to update its master plan, which the U.S. Forest Service accepted.
Ski areas with snowmaking capacity typically have existing pipelines and water infrastructure, coupled with significant vertical relief. This can create opportunities to generate electricity using energy harvested from water flowing downhill through a pipeline, particularly if reducing system pressure (like a pressure relief valve) is otherwise needed.
A 2013 law was designed to help small conduit-based hydropower projects by eliminating their need for a license or exemption from licensing issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Section 4 of the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 amended Section 30 of the Federal Power Act. Section 30 now provides that a "qualifying conduit hydropower facility" -- one that is determined or deemed to meet defined criteria -- is not required to be licensed or exempted from licensing under the Federal Power Act. These criteria include:
- The conduit the facility uses a tunnel, canal, pipeline, aqueduct, flume, ditch, or similar manmade water conveyance that is operated for the distribution of water for agricultural, municipal, or industrial consumption and not primarily for the generation of electricity.
- The facility is constructed, operated, or maintained for the generation of electric power and uses for such generation only the hydroelectric potential of a non-federally owned conduit.
- The facility has an installed capacity that does not exceed 5 megawatts.
- On or before August 9, 2013, the facility is not licensed, or exempted from the licensing requirements of Part I of the FPA.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission administers this statute. To start the regulatory process, on May 16, 2016, Alta filed a notice of intent to construct a qualifying conduit hydropower facility. Alta supplemented its notice on May 20 to clarify that the project "will only operate when there is excess capacity available in the pipeline and when water is hydrologically available", generally after the winter snowmaking season, during spring runoff. Alta also restated that the pipeline's main purpose will continue to be snowmaking.
Yesterday the FERC issued its notice of preliminary determination of a qualifying conduit hydropower facility for Alta's project. That notice examines the project relative to each of the four statutory criteria, and then provides the Commission's preliminary determination:
The proposed addition of the hydroelectric project along the existing water supply pipeline will not alter its primary consumptive purpose. Therefore, based upon the above criteria, Commission staff preliminarily determines that the proposal satisfies the requirements for a qualifying conduit hydropower facility, which is not required to be licensed or exempted from licensing.The notice also sets a 30-day deadline for filing motions to intervene, and a 45-day deadline for filing comments contesting whether the facility meets the qualifying criteria and providing an evidentiary basis.
Other recently proposed conduit hydro projects have been determined to be qualifying conduit hydropower facilities, including a Colorado project using an existing "ditch drop," a Castle Valley, Utah water treatment project, a California wholesale water agency conduit project, and a New Hampshire water works.
Labels:
Alta,
conduit,
exemption,
FPA,
HREA,
hydropower,
lake,
license,
micro hydro,
notice of intent,
pipeline,
runoff,
skiing,
small hydro,
snowmaking,
Utah
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
